Subject:
|
Re: 3T
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:31:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1095 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> Eight studs from the last cube should be ok. Right
> now, the board already has four, so another four
> would be all right.
Ok, if that works for Bryan and the rest. Of course, after you posted...
> I have mine built within the four stud area, but
> I know some of you guys will need the extra space.
...you *know* that I'm going to try to minimize the footprint as much as
possible. Sigh... I'm already keeping it to a single RCX. Sure, what's another
constraint among friends ;-) ?
> I'll talk with our marketing department.
Ha! You *are* the marketing department.
> the first round of 3T competition at our meeting the
> third Sunday in January. At that time, "helping" will
> be allowed.
Good. I'll be using my hands to place blocks ;-). The RCX will be a
paperweight. Oh wait, I can use a battery box for that...
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 3T
|
| This weekend we discussed adding the additional 4-studs of clearance to the side, the back, and/or both. Which is it? For my purely selfish reasons, I'd like no additional clearance requirements on the back (my side of the board) but the side would (...) (19 years ago, 12-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 3T
|
| (...) Eight studs from the last cube should be ok. Right now, the board already has four, so another four would be all right. I have mine built within the four stud area, but I know some of you guys will need the extra space. (...) I'll talk with (...) (19 years ago, 11-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
