Subject:
|
Re: 3T cube orientation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:14:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1240 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, December 14, 2005 11:24 am, Brian Davis wrote:
> Well then you're doing better than me at this point.
You keep saying that. I've taught Matt to play Tic-Tac-Toe. I think he's doing
better than you, at this point.
> Just to spell out another "this shouldn't need saying but..."... no cheating,
> correct?
I think that shouldn't need saying.
> How do we signal "won/lost"? To get credit for a match, does a robot have to
> signal that it understands how the game ended?
I think it's up to the builder how/if it signals the game is over.
It would be cool if the robot could display the amount of time it took to play the
game (it's half). But not required.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 3T cube orientation
|
| (...) Yes. hopefully, somebody will believe me at some point ;-). (...) Absolutely. To be fair, Matt has far more processing power than the RCX, extremely well-tested firmware, and a multi-year head start. (...) No, put it's one of the things I like (...) (19 years ago, 14-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 3T cube orientation
|
| Steve Hassenplug forwarded: (...) I'd agree with Steve - anything other then "bottoms up" should be OK. (...) Well then you're doing better than me at this point. Stupid grading... stupid stomach flu... stupid requirement of actually having a (...) (19 years ago, 14-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
