To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 7527
7526  |  7528
Subject: 
Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:10:03 GMT
Viewed: 
1310 times
  
"Calum Tsang" wrote:

I'm thinking of using a Digitrax DZ143 now.  They're about the same price • and a
lot smaller.

http://www.digitrax.com/dz143.htm

The only thing I was concerned about was the rating for current, but • that's 1.25
and the DH121 was 1.5A.

Someone was saying that the RCX was around 1.5A limit anyways.  Off to • build a
booster :)

Hi Calum,

The Lego train motors will draw about 750ma when stalled.  So, the DZ143
can handle the worst case scenario.  Most of the time however, the decoder
and motor draw only a fraction of that current when the trains are cruising.
I've been running three short trains (using one DZ143 and two DN121) on
the RCX, no problems.

BTW, the DZ143 is really nice.  I posted that it made half the buzzing
noise that the DN121 makes at low speeds, but I think it's even
quieter than that most of the time.  Plus, there's 4 outputs, ought to be
great for controlling some interesting lighting on a loco.

Mark



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
 
(...) I'm thinking of using a Digitrax DZ143 now. They're about the same price and a lot smaller. (URL) only thing I was concerned about was the rating for current, but that's 1.25 and the DH121 was 1.5A. Someone was saying that the RCX was around (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

27 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR