To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 7495
7494  |  7496
Subject: 
Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 02:06:36 GMT
Viewed: 
1191 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Brian H. Nielsen wrote:
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Brian H. Nielsen wrote:
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:

<snip>

Regarding reverse loops and DCC I seem to recall that it's possible to
automate them so you don't have to cut gaps that the motor has to coast
across

See this track diagram

http://members.shaw.ca/sask.rail/dcc/loop.html

   I'm not up on DCC, but with normal track it is normally done by having the
loop divided into 2 power blocks,

That diagram is divided into two blocks. One for the approaches, and one for the
reverse loop itself. That's standard wiring, been done that way since I was a
wee lad, there's no need to divide the reverse loop itself into two blocks.

With conventional control  (for example the old ATLAS line of components) you
reverse the loop block to match which way the train enters and while the train
is in the block, you reverse the approach block.

   Okay, yeah, my memory of what I too used to do years ago got cross-wired.

   Then I guess I don't understand the set-up that is causing his need for a gap
to be crossed.  Is it a DCC related issue or simply him not reversing the
polarity of the approaches while in the loop?


The latter I think... by having a truck long gap, the motor coasts across the
gap but never shorts out from one wheel set to the other, once it hits the
powered side again (even though the polarity is reversed) it just continues on.

This is actually an elegant solution if you can handle having the trains lurch a
bit. At the speeds we work at that's not a problem. For a two truck diesel in HO
that has interconnected power pickups on the trucks, and which is operating at
realistic speeds, it might not work well at all.

Brian H. Nielsen



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
 
(...) Yep--Larry hit it on the head--the isolated section is so there isn't one set of wheels on one polarity, and the other set of wheels on the reverse polarity-- (see if this font is really courier ;) ) ###...### Track TTTTT O O ###...### Track (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
 
(...) Okay, yeah, my memory of what I too used to do years ago got cross-wired. Then I guess I don't understand the set-up that is causing his need for a gap to be crossed. Is it a DCC related issue or simply him not reversing the polarity of the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)

27 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR