Subject:
|
Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:10:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1349 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Mario DeFacendis wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> > the insulated gap. What is a big headache, however, are the switches--the train
> > invariably ends up losing comunication across the switches at any speed.
> > Doesn't happen all the time, but half the time the engine just shudders thru the
> > switch--and only on the turn--the straight thru seems to be less of a problem.
> > I have wired it up such that both sides are 'live' at all times, no matter where
> > the switch is, but still the train shudders thru half the time.
>
>
> An easy solution to this is to have two locomotives in the train, each tuned to
> the same DCC channel. If one loco loses communication, the other will push it
> through the bad spots...
>
> That probably why real trains have two locos, right? :)
>
> Mario
Going to try that tonite--I own only 4 loco motors, and 3 are now converted to
DCC. Hopefully I'll get my hands on about 3-4 more motors and convert 'em.
But tonight I'll run 2 motors on one engine on one DCC channel and test that. I
think it should work flawlessly, from what I've seen, but surprises often happen
;)
Keep ya posted!
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
