Subject:
|
Re: Brickfest Pipe Racers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:39:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
459 times
|
| |
|
|
Chris Magno wrote:
>
> > I would think that through good mechanical design a robot that simply drives
> > forward with a battery box would have no problems navigating a 90 degree
> > sharp bend even.
>
>
> Rob, Jeff E, and Derek have shown me that many of our games do not need
> the RCX.
>
> and to have a challenge that has your robot play a token beep to force
> inclusion of the RCX is lame. If Calum is so gung ho about pipe
Two words: "Sound. Element."
Keep trying... I can't wait to watch all the little RCX entries fall
off the pipe because the extra beep-monitoring task slows the processor
down too much ;)
Jeff E
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickfest Pipe Racers
|
| (...) Rob, Jeff E, and Derek have shown me that many of our games do not need the RCX. and to have a challenge that has your robot play a token beep to force inclusion of the RCX is lame. If Calum is so gung ho about pipe racers, AND needed the RCX (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
