Subject:
|
Re: Is it wrong to cut up flex tubing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:04:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
381 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
> "Derek Raycraft" <derek.raycraft@sitraka.com> wrote in message
> news:3D86611F.5060509@sitraka.com...
>
> > First step was to remove the train wheels from their holders and use
> > those 1x2 plates with the groves on the sides to hold the wheels. This
> > reduced the height of the tilt mechanism by a full brick. I was very
> > happy with that.
>
> ::scratches head::
>
> I can't picture what piece you're talking about: "those 1x2 plates with the
> groves on the sides". I'm really curious about what you have come up with
> to hold the wheels!
Snipped - The message and the hoses :)
I believe that Derek is talking about this peice.
http://peeron.com/inv/parts/x68
Jeff VW
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Is it wrong to cut up flex tubing?
|
| (...) (URL) over in .trains posted a design for low profile trucks that used flex tubing and uses that door rail part.... this post is the start of a thread about it. (URL) might not be what was meant though. Hope that helps. 1 - collaborative (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Is it wrong to cut up flex tubing?
|
| "Derek Raycraft" <derek.raycraft@sitraka.com> wrote in message news:3D86611F.506050...aka.com... (...) ::scratches head:: I can't picture what piece you're talking about: "those 1x2 plates with the groves on the sides". I'm really curious about what (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
