Subject:
|
Re: did everyone have fun at mel's
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 21:40:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1342 times
|
| |
|
|
> Anyway, here are my
> ideas (pretty rough) I want to see a blockstacker done with pneumatics (kind of
> like Chris's, but one that works on its own).
Ohhhhhh was that a shot ???? (grin) what are you trying to say, that a
remote controlled robot is not allowed?
I'll have you know that I'm entering the exact same robot except maybe
I'll add code this time. (grin)
> This would probably take two
> RCX's to do it right (which counts me out), and I'm sure thats the type of
> thing Chris is working on right now.
seriously.... I'm rebuilding the same type of robot from the ground up.
it will be faster better cheaper. and it should only require 1 RCX.
why do you say that a proper bot would need 2?
> Another thing I want to try, but probably
> won't is to use the tank treads as conveyors to lift the blocks up into a
> chute. I'm picturing two treads running vertically. The neat thing about this
> is that they could run all the time from a seperate battery box, without
> needing to use an RCX output. When full, the chute would open to let go of the
> tower. I hope I have offered some inspiration,
this is the same kind of Idea Jeff used in his marble sorter
"Cinderblock" it used the old tank treads that always ran, powered buy
a batter box, then he stuck... pins in the treads which dragged marbles
up a ramp. it worked very well!!!
Chris
Lego Walker now @
www.members.home.net/cmagno/technics/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: did everyone have fun at mel's
|
| (...) Well, maybe it was a shot. No, just kidding. Make sure youre robot works next time, and wow me. (...) Faster better cheaper like NASA's recent probe to Mars?? just kidding. I guess I thought it would need two rcx's to control the mutiple (...) (26 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: did everyone have fun at mel's
|
| (...) Wow, three RCX's to play with, and you would let yourself get beat by someone who only has one?? I have lots of ideas for blockstackers, but I think I should just stick to the semi workable idea I had from last time. Maybe I could build (...) (26 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
