Subject:
|
Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:51:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3171 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Van Winden wrote:
| |
Of course the new version of the motor that comes with the battery train would
solve that problem.
|
Continuing along with that thought, how cool would this be? If I remember
right, you showed me that the new train wheels have a technic axle hole in them.
If we could get enough of those wheels (Bricklink, maybe?), then we wouldn’t
have to use the train motor, and could use the conventional 9V gearmotors (maybe
8t to 24t crown would be just the right reduction).
I’m getting a stopping accuracy of about +/- 0.1 dots by pulsing the motor on
the ramp-down, which I think is close enough. If we do something like Rob’s
suggested (cone and plug), that should be sufficent for any brick-on-brick
pressing. I also agree about the possibility of each vendor (!) doing their own
method of locating the pallet or whatever. We can each make up little fake
company names and pretend we’re all contract companies and rtlToronto is the
system integrator. ;)
-Iain
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
