To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / *3604 (-20)
  Blue screen of death
 
So, it took me a while, and I THINK, I MIGHT have solved the stupid rcx crash thing. My code has a wait until command. it is peppered throughout the code and it is a simple way for me to wait until BOTH the X and the Y are in position before i do a (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot - Accuracy
 
(...) There's a reason why it's inaccurate at slow speed, and a fix (requires taking apart the sensor and some soldering!) here (URL) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) ummm, magic?? :) -- Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot Accuracy
 
(...) increase. (...) That is the biggest problem I have. Even with my anti-external light shell (see here: (URL) I still need to adjust the value between day time and night time testing. (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) And what do you think keeps your code alive when you turn the RCX off? As for a stack problem, this would only happen when the RCX is executing your code. Whenever you download a program the memory is autmatically cleared. The stack idea is (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot Accuracy
 
So I have revamped Runamok 'Bot with 40 tooth gears for a great speed increase. And the rotation sensors are still accurate at this increased speed. Now, however, the light sensor misses--could be the codeing or the light conditions in my room--so (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: We're going to lose our position...
 
(...) So last night, I sat down in front of the mountain of lego... that will take me a good week to resort... I looked at my tri-griper EOAT that I got to grip and run up a 1 x 16 rack... not in the right order of course.... and I decided to start (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) this is my plan. I want to SLOW the entire thing down, and start to display data on the LCD. Bruce suggested to me that maybe some "stack" is not mis behaving. So a question to the Group. if a v 1.0 RCX that is always powered by an official (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: 2002 FBTB comments
 
Hey Calum, 2002 and we've cut our expectations back to basic tubs. Hmm, not much of a stretch from here to the belching smokestacks and mega-urban wasteland of Bladerunner. :P I know what you mean about the sets, but I'm finding that I'm getting (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) To (mis)quote the IBM commercial: "That's when it hits you: You are so beat by Bruce." :) If it makes you feel better, I have disassembled pretty well all of the xEmployees entry to increase sensor resolution, gearing ratios, EOAT speeds and a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) WELL, truth be told, what Derek told us really scared me. from my current speed of (bleep) the thought of having to shave off 4 more seconds.... I just knew I could NOT do it in software. i took a look at my code and i can safely say that ALL (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) You know Chris, I think I have just as much fun taking shots at you as I do planning for the demise of your robot (and Dave's and Derek's and the rest of you....that ought to start something). FYI, I have the Y-axis built (I will have to (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) Sure you do Bruce, Sure you have accuracy on your X axis. but you still have to build the Y axis and the EOAT. THEN you have to code it. then DEBUG it. THEN if i know you, you will want to bring it to work to have your minions re-code it (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) As usual, I don't think you quite get it...I have near perfect accuracy combined with speed. I think I could actually increase the speed and still maintain the accuracy (to the top of single tooth). I'm quite pleased...although, I know only (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) excellent..... (drum fingers) Now, as soon as that "accident" happens to Dereks robot I will be unstoppable!!! moo ha ha ha -- Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) On the top of the tooth....within 1/16th of an inch...every time. On top of that, my x-axis is the heaviest component (carries the Y-axis) and is driven 3:1 to the rack. (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Robot – Accuracy
 
(...) What do you mean by tooth? As in variability of a width of a tooth (ie, roughly 2mm wide (I mean, 1/8" of an inch or so :)) or like consistently on the top of the tooth? Calum (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: We're going to lose our position...
 
(...) I'd guess he's cut off the centre protusion, and glued a 1/2 bush on the back to make up for the decreased stability. ROSCO (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Robot – Accuracy
 
I haven’t finished my robot because I couldn’t get repeatable accuracy from the rotation sensors. I tried various solutions but nothing was giving me the accuracy I wanted. It was driving me nuts! I switched over to touch sensors, combined with a (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Rotation Sensors
 
(...) ....and me....I equally get upset at large-scale buyers who gouge the less informed consumer... (...) Yep...I think there is....also upsetting is people who design a set / maybe nice / maybe not (subject to interpretation) and then selling it (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR