 | | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Chris, Feel free to post v1.1. It is just pomakis code with no changes. Kevin (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The NEXT game.
|
|
I like this idea, and will probably attempt to build a robot. (...) From the department of redundancy department... But seriously, 3 feet sounds good. (...) None, other than itself. (...) None. Just remember that the more RCXen you have, the heavier (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
|
(...) I can see a few soloutions: 1 on board UI. run prg slot 1 or 2 depending on who goes first. for OTHER os's then you can have an ON BOARD UI, press view, or prg. to start. 2. beam a "message" to each brick. 1 or 2. 3. put a touch sensor on each (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | C$ - Code Only
|
|
Here's a quick look at the interface for a code-only C$ game. 1) There must be some method to tell you code if it's going first or second. 2) When it's your turn, calculate a move, then send an IR message which indicates the column number (1-7) of (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Great News!!!!
|
|
(...) AHh, but the issue was that, iirc, (and maybe I dont), 2000 *wasn't* a leap year--but I could be wrong on that Lemmee go check 2000 calendars... D'oh! My bad! I once again have a faulty recollection! Not unheard of. And I stand corrected. (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Great News!!!!
|
|
(...) You mean besides the one four years ago? Yes, indeed, 2000 was a leap year. Everyone knows that a year that's divisible by 4 is a leap year (well, barring really young kids and such). Lots of people also know that you end up with a few extra (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Fun
|
|
(...) Sounds like fun! (...) What? You think I'm a dink? (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Great News!!!!
|
|
Dinner this month (if there is one, I'll wait for official word from the leaders...) is... (wait for it...) Friday the 13th!!!!!! Woot! This coming on the same February with a leap day in it, and the first leap year in 8 years!!!! Ooooohhhh, the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The NEXT game.
|
|
(...) In defence of Rob, he showed up for Marble Sorting (or hoarding... whatever). In defence of me, I've let the leaders know when I was going to be involved, or not going to be involved, in a competition well before hand. Don't 'dumb' things down (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Revised topo map for train6m?
|
|
(...) The date? April 18th... The place?? THe convention Center!! Be There!!!! You'll have the whole seat, but you'll only need the edge!!!!! Eh, is a train show... I'll have the entire back part filled with modules, baseplates and track. Not too (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The NEXT game.
|
|
(...) When you say the whole robot... never mind. I think that's pretty clear. :) (...) ... (...) This suggestion has already been added to the "Rob, Matthias, Greg" pile, right? (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: C$ -- its all over
|
|
(...) new sig line? maybe. (...) I've been thinking there were 12, but you actually listed 14 robots below... (...) The first thing that seemed to slip the minds of most people is that one of the goals of these rtl events is to build a robot that (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Revised topo map for train6m?
|
|
(...) Now that C$ is done I'm putting all my Lego concentration on Train. I'll be going over the layout and designs this week. Dave, what's the date in April we are aiming for? We'll need to have a roll call to see if all the builders can make it. (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The NEXT game.
|
|
(...) Just a suggestion from an 'outsider' (non-RTL person) - how about robots that have to climb the rope, then back down to the ground, and back to their starting spot, or to a common "finish line"? This would make multiple challenges: Find the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The NEXT game.
|
|
(...) Anything anyone wants will be flat out ignored. Sick of doing games where the requestor doesn't show the hell up (Rob, Matthias, Greg :). (...) I've been dying to do a rope/over our heads game for a long long time. LEAVE NO PART OF YOUR ROBOT (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Fun
|
|
(...) Steve, I REALLY like this idea. its VERY geeky, and was somthing i wanted to do for a dinner, but was quickly shot down by Calum saying it was too geeky. (the same calum who spends his off hours makeing digital picture frames, mp3 players for (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | The NEXT game.
|
|
In conversations that started off with Bruce, and expanded to a few of us at the end of the night.... I think we have a working game to be argued about here. our criteria. 1. Chris does not want to hump the 8x8' play field anywhere 2. Bruce does (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | your OLD connect four game boards
|
|
Will be accepted for donation to a Children's day care in Toronto. Kate said that her Daycare will take them off your hands, if you don't ever want to see those stupid checkers, and yellow boards again. it turns out that kids are very hard on these (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | C$ -- its all over
|
|
What a whirlwind of a day. I've been busy with personal commitments for the remainder of the week, so have not had a chance to talk about C$.. with that said.... this is how the final four breaks down: Steve the guy we all Love to hate, came in (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Revised topo map for train6m?
|
|
(...) maps for (...) "Topo" I remember as being this old ugly "robot" offered in like the 70's or 80's. It had two wheels at weird angles which looked silly, and a giant octagonal head. :) (...) 2010 (...) I have so many favourite lines from that (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
