 | | Re: Play Area
|
|
(...) It's not you, Chris mentioned it too. I'm not eager to change it at this point, as others have already started. So unless it's impossible, let's just make sure everyone's aware of this restriction and work around it. (...) I don't really love (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Wonder where all the Connect Fours went in North America?
|
|
(...) It is, actually. It makes me want to do a charity event somehow in rtlToronto, but I'm not sure how to do it, in all honesty. I'm sure I'll snap out of this unusual charitable moment and continue with the cold harsh outlook I've learned from (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: empty cell vs. Black chip.
|
|
(...) Mirror? Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Play Area
|
|
I have a question for people who have built (or are building) robots for Deep Yellow. Has anyone else noticed the common area restrictions to be a problem? What I mean is the fact that a robot is not allowed to enter the area past the left edge of (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | empty cell vs. Black chip.
|
|
has anyone else come across this dilemma: the light reading between a black chip and an empty C$ cell are VERY small. on the order of 1% other than adding a light to the sensor (which is clunky and only helps a little bit) OR do you put a light (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Wonder where all the Connect Fours went in North America?
|
|
(...) ENUFF of your INSOLENCE!!! actually, I don't really CARE to scan the entire board. BUT in the spirit of motivating the rest of RTL, I find that I have to create some arbitrary unit of measure as a kind of challenge to the group. ERGO, if my (...) (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Wonder where all the Connect Fours went in North America?
|
|
(...) Chris: Why on earth would you scan every square? Surely the worst scenario is scanning the top of all seven columns? (21 years ago, 24-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: scan time....
|
|
(...) what am I missing??? I've explained that !!AT FIRST ATTEMPT!!! it take 35 seconds to scan the board. with 42 cells on the board that's less than a second a cell, OR just over 5 seconds to scan a row...... this still means that I have one day (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: scan time....
|
|
(...) Hmmm... I must have had a slightly different method in mind than Chris. At 35 seconds to scan the board, I get 5 seconds per scanned square. Silly me. (...) I wish - *that* contest I might have a chance on. Someday, I'll get up there for a rtl (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: scan time....
|
|
(...) That's strange--I was just thinking that Steve must be rubbing his hands with glee!! "Oh those rtl'ers--they won't know what hit 'em!! I'll come up with a witty response, throwing down something like 'I can do that 'bot with one motor!!'", and (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: scan time....
|
|
(...) this is sarcasm.... I can tell. (...) freak! (...) gee, and you wonder why people have it "out for you" :) <-- always implied Chris "It is a very clever strategy IMHO, and I applaud Chris for thinking of it." K.C. (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: scan time....
|
|
(...) wow. 35 seconds? That's almost 1 second per square. That's pretty fast. Mine takes almost 4 seconds. I'm just wrapping up my second C$ robot. It only uses 1 motor. Next, I need to start on my marble sorting robot... Steve (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: scan time....
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) There is always.... (wait for it...) Marble sorting! That is, if ya give up on the C$ Dave K -who is happy he's running the Marble Revisited 'cause that'll be the fun competition and all (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | scan time....
|
|
POINTLESS. but FYI my first attempt at a board scan resulted in a time of 35 seconds. Heck, at that speed, my Project X could have done TWO anti-X times. now, if only I can find some way to program some sort of random number...... think think (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Wonder where all the Connect Fours went in North America?
|
|
To Penny Arcade's damned charity! (URL) Charity bad! :) Calum (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Progress report # 1
|
|
end of day one: captains log; I now have a simple Cartesian robot, that can move in an X and Y direction. I spent more time on the "test" code than anything else. As of now, I have the Y axis hunting back and forth between 7 spots. I could not use (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: This sweatshirt
|
|
<snip> (...) (raises hand..) I was the guilty party responsible for trying to sell those sweatshirts to everybody (except Adrian Drake...he doesn't wear sweatshirts...or so he told me..lol). I was working that day on behalf of manager Dan. (I came (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Train Design Layout for Dave K
|
|
I seem to be singularly uninspired--I can't seem to come up with a good train layout for my basement. Here's a current Track Designer file of my basement layout as of today. (URL) anyone feels like throwing ideas around for a layout, it would be (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: I hate lawyers!!!
|
|
So now all three companies involved--the telco, the barrister and the collections agency, all assure me that this matter is being looked into and that I do not have to go to court and such. I keep on mentioning to them, however, that I'd like that (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: This sweatshirt
|
|
(...) I make bad assumptions at times--if the 9v adapter works for my current 1.0 RCX, and the 9v adapter works for my LEGO 9v DC motors, I assumed that the adapter was 9v DC. As such, I should just be able to use that 9v adapter for my 1.5 and 2.0. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
