To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.parlugmentOpen lugnet.org.ca.parlugment in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / ParLUGment / 104
103  |  105
Subject: 
Re: train bridges
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.org.ca.monlug
Date: 
Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:33:37 GMT
Viewed: 
39 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
"Tim Strutt" <heidi.strutt@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:GFBBz9.Bp9@lugnet.com...

Here's the piece I was going to use for the top arch:
http://guide.lugnet.com/partsref/search.cgi?q=6108

That is a beautiful arch piece!

I can't see having any lateral clearance issues with that piece. Great!

Note also that real railways use a "clearance envelope" that is NOT a
rectangle, it has missing/rounded corners as well. So having more clearance
in the center of a tunnel arch opening is very prototypical.

Take a look at autoracks some time. They have rounded tops because they are
conforming to the clearance envelope that was in effect at the time they
were designed. (at the time that the conventional 3 layer autorack was
designed, it was one of the tallest cars contemplated)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: train bridges
 
"Tim Strutt" <heidi.strutt@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:GFBBz9.Bp9@lugnet.com... (...) I can't see having any lateral clearance issues with that piece. Great! Iain (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.org.ca.monlug)

24 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR