| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> ROB,
>
> Clearly you just don't understand us train folks.
> I think you should abandon this project and stick with robot monkeys.
> Everyone knows that the stud width of all trains has been set to the
> Chris standard of 40. see my earlier post.
>
> ;)
>
> P.S. check out my new sig file.
>
> Chris
> See my latest Track layout here:
> http://www.members.home.net/magno42/temp/train_vll/layout.jpg
Well Chris, I laughed pretty hard at that one. You have way too much time on
your hands. I'm sure you downloaded the track layout program just so you
could write that. Don't worry: I started working on some concepts for my
monkey last night... Got some really neat ideas... No pictures yet.
Personally I prefer 7 wide trains my self. Sure they may look a bit
lopsided, but you get the best of both worlds...
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: train bridges
|
| (...) thank you. you see this is the kind of thing i need to see in reply's. it makes me feel good to know that people actually think the stupid things i type are funny. it feels a bit weird sometimes, sending something off like that and wondering (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: train bridges
|
| ROB, Clearly you just don't understand us train folks. I think you should abandon this project and stick with robot monkeys. Everyone knows that the stud width of all trains has been set to the Chris standard of 40. see my earlier post. ;) P.S. (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
