| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang writes:
<snip>
> The general guideline is that we're going to attempt to be eight wide
> compatible for the folks from MonLUG and ParLUGment who might be eight wide
> (even if I think rtlToronto should be primarily six wide). What this means
> practically:
>
> -At least 1 dot extra on each side of the 8 dot wide track
>
> -At minimum 15 bricks tall clearance for EluraCar camera car system (not an
> absolute requirement, but a nicety), 14 bricks tall for larger cars like the
> 4552 Railcrane.
Calum,
ParLUGment won't have any 8-wide cars, and I think Martin (MonLUG) has
decided to go back to 6-wide. So don't worry about us. However, we do
need to keep in mind that long cars going around curves need extra width
if they are going onto or off of a bridge.
Also, a question about the EluraCar; does it need 15-brick height across
the entire width? The reason I ask is that I am trying to build a tunnel
and with the arch on top of the entrance/exit it has less clearance at the
sides than it does in the center. Please let me know, as I really want it
to accomodate the EluraCar.
Thanks. Play well.
Tim Strutt 8^)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: train bridges
|
| (...) The general guideline is that we're going to attempt to be eight wide compatible for the folks from MonLUG and ParLUGment who might be eight wide (even if I think rtlToronto should be primarily six wide). What this means practically: -At least (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
