Subject:
|
Re: latest layout photo
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:15:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
860 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Koob writes:
> James Brown wrote
> > About the only thing I don't like is no train yard...
>
> I agree with the need for an obvious train yard.
Have a look and tell me what you think...
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=16397
The mountain (upper left) has the main line running under in via a
tunnel, and the elevated section goes over and through it. A curved
section would be carved out to make room, just like the Rockies... :-)
SRC
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: latest layout photo
|
| (...) Hmm. I'll confess I have a *really* hard time judging how elevations and so forth look from a 2D overhead. That being said, I think I'd prefer if the elevation changes were limited to what we need to have for the terrain. I realize that we're (...) (24 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
| | | Re: latest layout photo
|
| Hello Steve, The new train yard is much better. But, the elevated section doesn't really tie in to anything, it is just there because. The clearances are inadequate, both for the trains, only about 12 bricks I think, and the monorail track is about (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: latest layout photo
|
| James Brown wrote in message <39DBE42C.527B8E3C@s...ht.com>... (...) mountain (...) I agree with the need for an obvious train yard. One idea would be to squeeze in two more 30" tables at the bottom center. Our total layout dimensions would (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
