 | | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Wow... By the way, which book are you talking about? (a search for "alien" in amazon will give an undesirable amount of results I assume..:-) Selçuk (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) You mean Timeline? For me, that book was the final nail in the Crichton Coffin, as if I'd needed another. He's a writer like Keanu Reeves is an actor. (...) What a waste of Bruce Campbell. And Laura Linney, now that I think of it. Tim Curry (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Guilty! I even read "Eaters of the Dead", "The Great Train Robbery" and his latest screenpla...book. The operative question is: Did anyone see "Congo" the movie? ...and not wish they hadn't? Bruce (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Did _anyone_ read Congo? I mean besides Crichton himself, of course! 8^) Dave! (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Ever suppose Cameron read "Starship Troopers"? :-) Or, "Congo" for that matter (the dual automated machine gun sequence)? Actually, I always thought they left a perfectly good explanation out - there should have been a second squad that got (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Can't say that I disagree. "Oh, geez, we just laid waste to half the planet - kinda, pretty, though, ain't it?" StOOpid. Bruce (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Yah, but the fun part is figuring out a reasonable "in-character" reason for only sending 12 guys. :) I got an impression of the CM that's a little bit like fire fighters are today... a lot of training, and a lot of specialized equipment, and (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) I thought they only sent a dozen because it was a bug hunt. ;^) ~1st Lieutenant, Fleebnork Division Muffin Head (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Weren't they a bunch of pirates or mercenaries? ~1st Lieutenant, Fleebnork Division Muffin Head (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) sent a dozen troops solely for the purpose of increased dramatic tension? Dave! (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) **snip** (...) Not as tragic, presumably, as if the aliens had landed, but that's another matter. That same guy (whose name I forget but could find easily enough if I weren't so lazy at the moment) directed City of Lost Children, another (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) If I may stray into the topic of Alien IV, I've always found it ironically amusing that the crew remarked how beautiful Earth is as they entered the atmosphere shortly after the mothership took out all of southern Africa. The crew seemed to be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) The Sulaco was sent out on a special mission. Quite a lot of the ship was unused at the time. I typed up a big ol' blurb about it here: (URL) Lieutenant, Fleebnork Division Muffin Head (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) After hearing the premise of Alien 3, I determined that I would never, ever watch it. Still haven't. :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:>I saw the first showing in a mostly empty theatre with really high-backed (...) Back in '92 a local theater showed the Alien triple-header to a mostly empty theater. It was wild to see the three (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) That's true, and a good point. For consistency's sake, I guess we could posit that the automated ships aren't sufficiently savvy to drop from orbit and land in hostile environments without some sort of ground-based guidance, but even this (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) "We're looking for a few good men and women, and we *do* mean a few." (...) Not bad, and not inconsistent with most of what we see. Would there have been sufficient gravity, then, for the alien and Ripley to fall into the airlock? That would (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) I'd always understood it (aside from the dramatic necessities of the plot line) as a logical extension of the colonial marine mentality of "be prepared". It may well be more economical in the long run to send a ship that can do 95% of what (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) That's down sizing for you. (...) Perhaps gravity genarators are very large pieces of equipment? (...) I'd say the propulsion systems WE'RE needed. (...) Perhaps the ship is multipurpose and designed to fight it's way into a heavily defended (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) The ship and crew are full of gravity throughout the movie; it's a grave situation. (I apologize.) (...) I just saw Aliens again this weekend, and I have another question. Why does a ship the size of New Jersey (or whatever its size--it's (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Because it's too darn hard to show zero grav over a whole movie. Either that or they have a gravity field generator of some kind. Or constant acceleration or deceleration (not that the crew are positioned correctly to show this). (...) If they (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Alien and gravity
|
|
(...) Wouldn't you want to enjoy gravity if you were traveling in space for months at a time? (...) Perhaps Nostromo is sufficiently blunt 400 years in the future. Even wrecker drivers take pride in their rigs - and no wonder! Drivers have to pay (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Alien and gravity
|
|
I'm watching the movie "Alien". Why is there gravity on board the ship? It does not rotate to generate "artificial gravity", and there are no large planets around. Ok, so they do operate in a solar system, but they're not that close to a planet. And (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) The amusing thing on Red Hat Linux is that herbivore and omnivore are there, as are carnivorous and carnivorously, but not carnivorous. (23 years ago, 14-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) On most anything, actually. It's really not meant to be a dictionary, even though the directory looks like it. Sometimes a random word comes in handy, though. (...) None of them are found in the sloaris /usr/dict/words. :) Besides, in this age (...) (23 years ago, 13-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) /usr/dict/words on many linux distributions is terrible. Here's an interesting test: grep herbivore /usr/dict/words grep omnivore /usr/dict/words grep carnivore /usr/dict/words (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) It was indeed a little off. I'd worked out 7.4 letters per word based on an even-ish distribution; working on the list from the linux /usr/dict/words shows an average of 8.4 letters per word (after subtracting out the ^Js) for words in nature. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Not sure this is a good assumption. The letters aren't evenly distributed -- for example, E is way more common than Z. The median letter is probably somewhere around K -- and you only need to get up to 'E' to be past the 1/4 mark. (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Part of the problem was bad communication (by Nik to us). This was an enrichment assignment, not a mandatory one. And only some of the kids got it, it wasn't intended to actually be solved... (I know this now because Jo called me, it's been (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Finally remembered the assignment: get as close as you can to 100 without going over. Only one word, but it had to at least be 90, so most kids searched around a bit until they got one close, but it didn't drag on forever. Everyone compared (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) I hope you will not be too tough on her. She probably found the assignment and thought it sounded good and assigned it without taking the time to try it out herself (happens more at this time of year when teachers are getting swamped with (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Done. -JDF (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) zebrahides at 97 is the closest I came for a Z (...) Well someone mail me the words and I'll have Nik turn them all in along with Dan's perl 1 liner and no other comment.... :-) ++Lar (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Just getting *over* 100 is quite easy, you just need words that have a number of late alpahabet letters. Since R, S, and T are common letters and are late in the alphabet you are all set. Like I said, ironically, "alphabet" itself is 99... so (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
My son had a similiar assignment (2nd or third grade - he's in fourth now), but it wasn't *exactly* 100. I don't remember the exact parameters of the assignment, but it wasn't something frustratingly difficult - finding exact 100 pt. words is going (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) This must be proof that linux is better than solaris. There's 20,000 more words in /usr/dict/words on my dedrat 6.x box, and 242 more of them score 100 points. The religous wars can end now. :) Still no x or z. Oddly enough, my dedrat 7.0 box (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) not going into a holy war, it's a mess cause I Wanted it to be :) the original form was 10 lines, and quite readable :) (...) keyboards kissers - not sure if 'kissers' is a word, but I think 'keyboards' should qualify... :) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Neither could I. This one's on sloaris, and I apologize for my mediocre coding style. It's still much more readable than that perl mess ever hoped to be, but probably took me longer. :) #include <stdio.h> int fd; FILE *fi; char buf[20]; int (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) I couldn't help it... and it's my first attempt at a one liner :) perl -ne 'BEGIN{for('a'..'z')...f$t==100;' /usr/dict/linux.words comes out with 498 words out of 45402 in the file... pretty fast too :) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Reasonable assignment for a third grader?
|
|
(...) Hm. Figuring the average letter is worth 13.5 points, this means that most words are going to be in the 7-8 letter range. That's probably reasonable for a third grader. I suppose it's a way to get in a heck of a lot of boring arithmetic (...) (23 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
