|
| |
|  
worlds
(score: 0.422)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.422)
|
|
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) The world needs to come to terms with the simple fact that the US *IS MIGHTIER THAN THOU* It's not pretentious, merely fact. Be thankful that the US also happens to be the greatest power ever to have existed on the face of the earth AND shows (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
worlds
(score: 0.422)
|
|
| |
|
quiz
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.418)
|
|
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
| (...) If this is what they're doing, then I believe they're doing a good thing. The original thread of this discussion however had nothing to do with whether or not they are actually doing this. It was about them releasing products to try and (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
smallest
(score: 0.416)
|
|
| | Re: Race Erase
|
| (...) Yeah, I just finished reading that, after I read the article about Lott appearing on BET. Reading the article on Lott--there's political waffling and weaseling if I ever read it. But having no 'racial profiling' in the genes--that's pretty (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.415)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.414)
|
|
| | Keeping it sane...
|
| I read a few message boards daily, and one that I often frequent has a policy in place-- No religious/political debate. They implemented that policy 'cause, invariably, the discussion would get, usually quite quickly, bogged down into a 'flame war'. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 0.413)
|
|
| | Re: IGNORANT view fuel the IRA?
|
| (...) Does everyone in Isreal support the occupation of the West Bank? Does the majority even do so? (...) When Shamir ended his term as PM this is what he had to say: "It pains me greatly that in the coming four years I will not be able to expand (...) (22 years ago, 30-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | Re: British-Christians fuel the IRA?
|
| (...) The Palestinian and Isrealis, and the Irish and the English need to try and realize that their best course of action is negotiation and compromise. Effectively, though, this means that Isrealis need to give up some land, and the English need (...) (22 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | American-Christians fund the IRA?
|
| (...) If you mean me, I don’t think I have ever made any link between the IRA and American-Christians or even Irish-Americans [whatever they are] specifically? Call me on that if I’m wrong, otherwise I’d appreciate some clarification. Further, the (...) (22 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) I agree 100%. But the problem is that conservatives in general (and, honestly, you in particular, in OT.debate at least) tend to castigate liberal commentators for doing exactly the same things for which conservative commentators are lauded. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) I prefer Mike Huben's analysis: "The Libertarian Party is well on its way to dominating the political landscape, judging from its power base of 100+ elected dogcatchers and other important officials after 25 years of effort." ;) More here: (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) I think we can agree that wackos come in all favors. (...) I am not for silencing criticism, but I think that insults are not necessary. How about *constuctive* criticism-- that's what I'd like. (...) I don't watch TV, much less own cable, so (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) You're injecting another issue into the discussion, which I will address in a moment. In any case, let's consider what you're saying: You're claiming that conservative talking heads can't be called demagogues as long as they are open about (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.412)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) I wouldn't exactly call "he who has the biggest stick" a naive solution-- perhaps a tried and proven one.... Remember, Saddam has a pretty big stick himself-- he has butchered 100,000s of his own people with it! So why are so many bleeding (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.411)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) And I wonder how we would all feel if Dubya at least acted like a true leader of "the people"--leading them to do the right thing--instead of trotting down the same old 'naive solution' of 'he who has the biggest stick'. What I want to hear, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 0.411)
|
