Subject:
|
Re: Vote against/for...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:03:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
723 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> If that's all your party ever wants to aspire to be (a spoiler), then knock
> yourselves out.
I prefer Mike Huben's analysis:
"The Libertarian Party is well on its way to dominating the political
landscape, judging from its power base of 100+ elected dogcatchers and other
important officials after 25 years of effort."
;)
More here:
http://world.std.com/~mhuben/onelesson.html
Scott A
=+=
Have you inspected Arthur's Seat yet?
http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=scotta
"A reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable
man persists in attempting to adapt his environment to suit himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." (GBS)
=+=
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) If that's all your party ever wants to aspire to be (a spoiler), then knock yourselves out. But think about this: think about a senate with *no* clear majority and libertarian Republicans controlling the swing votes. That's power. What you (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
