To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18345
18344  |  18346
Subject: 
Re: Vote against/for...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:54:52 GMT
Viewed: 
769 times
  
1 - note how a poor debater(1) just did a character assassination against a
Cato member instead of addressing the points raised, over in another thread.

2 - note that it's not a personal insult to point out that someone is a poor
debater. It may not be kind to point out the truth, but the truth is what it
is, after all...


Give it a rest. I wrote this post in an effort to stop your disruptive
behaviour:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=18317

Be man enough to either stick to the issues or keep quiet.


Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) It's not. But we're performing a useful service to the country nonetheless. A filibuster proof Senate with the likes of Bob Barr running some things is a scary thought to behold. (...) c /libertarian Republicans/Libertarians/ and you're on to (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR