Results 441 – 460 of about 1300.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
 | | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) Actually it doesn't have any such responsibility. It may be prudent to broadcast unaltered information (although it usually isn't, political slant is a good way to differentiate yourself from your competitors) but I'm willing to bet that if (...) (17 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Views on asylum seekers?
|
| Seems like the stance of the Australian government (URL) has become an international news item. Political issues aside (if possible), I'd be interested in other peoples views on this (especially non-Australians). Basically, asylum seekers make their (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Re: LP statement on terrorist attacks
|
| (...) Larry, give me a break. You're much more intelligent that you are trying to act here. The LP is taking political advantage of the current crises to promote themselves. If that's not pandering, then I don't know what is. (23 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Re: Who are we to judge?
|
| (...) Sorry, I calls them as I sees them. And if anything, I was trying to antagonize people into being anything BUT political sheep. You should do as pleases you. But I wasn't attacking you for anything more than defending the words of a man I (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Re: More on Palestine
|
| (...) Some people would say that terrorism is the act of attacking civilians with the intention of reaching some kind of a (political) goal. During these discussions, the word terrorism is actually a problem. The problem is that the word is (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...
|
| (...) We don't have to look much further than the last U.S. Presidential election to find confirmation in that! (...) Rule Number 1 of political debates: He Who Mentions Hitler First Loses! :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
| relative OTD newbie jumps in. Website: None yet, I gotta get me one of those Residence: Ontario, Southern California. Political: libertarian with a lower case L, because I don’t agree with all their views, but pro-capitalism, anti-big government, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | This boils my bald head
|
| (URL) Let's kill bald eagles> When or where will political correctness finally end? This is simply NUTS! I've forgotten-- didn't they rule that sacrificing chickens for religious purposes was illegal for some reason? Maybe they, uh, chickened out (...) (18 years ago, 23-May-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...
|
| Simon, (...) Heaven forbid I might use a word. (...) As I do yours, but I digress. (...) I can tell you things about political name calling, but I don't feel like bringing that up again. (...) First of all, Simon, I was not really replying to you, I (...) (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Re: Hiroshima-Was It Necessary?
|
| (...) Nope, it was definitely a thread. My post on the subject, which includes why I think it was both political and necessary, is here: (URL)Honestly, it sounds like you were making a rather "might-makes-right" (...) The most devastating war in ALL (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| | Been too quiet here...
|
| I stumbled upon this site a little while ago: (URL) Despite the *ahem* subtle political flavor of the text, it must be recognized that it has no real value as an anti-gun-ownership argument. I just found some of the info interesting and something of (...) (23 years ago, 14-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
|
| |
|
political
(score: 1.605)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
