Subject:
|
Re: Who are we to judge?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:42:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
287 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Stanley writes:
> Some of you guys (you probably included, Richard) obviously keep up with and
> know a LOT more about this foreign policy/international relations stuff than
> I do. I'm ok with that, and you're obviously pleased with it as it seems
> you believe it gives you some sort of elevated right to judge others and
> their opinions. We don't have any college professors here, do we? I've
> only encountered this level of arrogance among tenured profs before.
Sorry, I calls them as I sees them.
And if anything, I was trying to antagonize people into being anything BUT
political sheep. You should do as pleases you.
But I wasn't attacking you for anything more than defending the words of a
man I consider to be but a little more intelligent than some kind of trained
monkey. If you place an idiot War-God in my way, I will try to knock him
down -- and it's done better with words than fisticuffs because we are
fighting an information war anyway. And, as you may imagine, I am opposed
to fisticuffs in any case.
Welcome to World War III.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Who are we to judge?
|
| (...) I don't often point out arrogance in others as I've very aware that I sometimes exhibit more than my own share of it. Not sure if you're pegging me as one of these sheep, although if you are I guess it doesn't bother me much, as I don't need (...) (23 years ago, 24-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
