To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13179
13178  |  13180
Subject: 
Re: Who are we to judge?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:31:42 GMT
Viewed: 
1527 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> 
> snip
> 
> If we *created* bin Laden's ability to be a terrorist (and I'm pretty
> comfortable that we did, at least in large part if not completely), seems to
> me we ought to clean it up. He's not playing nicely with the toys we gave
> him, time to take them away. Too bad it took this long and this level of
> provocation to realise it. And sending flowers ain't the way to do it.
> 
> That does NOT in any way conflict with my general, isolationist, "we are not
> the world's policeman" stance.

Try this, for an idea on why that stance may have to shift:
http://slate.msn.com/code/kausfiles/kausfiles.asp?Show=9/23/2001&idMessage=8340
("Stating the Obvious" here: http://www.kausfiles.com/ )

--DaveL



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
(...) I expect people to clean up their own messes. Holds for my kids, holds for litterers (I have in the past almost been punched for tossing cigarette butts back into the open windows of cars that they just came out of :-) ), holds for polluters, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR