To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13088
13087  |  13089
Subject: 
Re: Who are we to judge?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 23 Sep 2001 06:56:25 GMT
Viewed: 
228 times
  
I think in the context that this remark was made it was pretty clear what
our President meant, and I think the answer to your question is pretty obvious.

You're entitled to your opinion.  Heck, I don't even have a problem if you
or anyone else wants to complain about whatever "retaliation" we end up
taking.  But in the context of the rest of the speech Bush made I think it
is clear that he was saying that the *nations* who are with the terrorists
are the ones who harbor, train, and fund them.

You're not in the business of harboring, training, or funding terrorists, I
assume.  Then no, even if you disagree with whatever we end up doing, that
doesn't (in and of itself) make you a terrorist sympathizer.

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Carl Watson writes:
Is this the same speech were he said "You are either with us, or with the
terrorists"?
I have a problem with this because I certainly don't agree with the US's
retaliation, does that make me a terrorist sympathiser?



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Stanley writes: But in the context of the rest of the speech Bush made I think it (...) Well, here's where we get into how slippery and essentially empty the president's rhetoric really is... Nations are not things (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Stanley writes: [snip] (...) So it's OK for GWB to unilaterally dismiss the notion of neutrality? I too am not particularly happy with this particular line. Though my government (and myself) are behind the US in (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message.... <snip> (...) Is this the same speech were he said "You are either with us, or with the terrorists"? I have a problem with this because I certainly don't agree with the US's retaliation, does that make me a (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR