To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13087
13086  |  13088
Subject: 
Re: Who are we to judge?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 23 Sep 2001 06:10:48 GMT
Viewed: 
249 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message....
<snip>
the repeated invocation of God in Bush's speech on Thursday is about the
only part I found fault with.

Is this the same speech were he said "You are either with us, or with the
terrorists"?
I have a problem with this because I certainly don't agree with the US's
retaliation, does that make me a terrorist sympathiser?

Carl
--
Member #1165
http://www.lugnet.com/people/members/?m=1165
Adelaide LEGO Users Group
http://www.ozbricks.com/adelugs/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
I think in the context that this remark was made it was pretty clear what our President meant, and I think the answer to your question is pretty obvious. You're entitled to your opinion. Heck, I don't even have a problem if you or anyone else wants (...) (23 years ago, 23-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who are we to judge?
 
Snippety snip (...) All? This isn't about Christian(1) vs. Islamic cultures, this is about relatively free cultures vs. relatively barbaric ones. Our culture (faults and all, taken as a whole) is superior to the Taliban (virtues and all). That makes (...) (23 years ago, 22-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR