Results 581 – 600 of about 1900.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) A number of people duplicated the results by following the same method as the original claimants - but basically those were non-critical attempts (the methods themselves were not initially questioned). I asked my father-in-law at the time why (...) (23 years ago, 3-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) I was only speaking from a hypothetical standpoint and not voicing my own opinion. My viewpoint is the same as yours, but from the Catholic standpoint, you just commited a sin (the thought is the same as the action), so what does that imply? (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) It is neither here nor there. If there is a gay gene, I don't see what the Bible has to do with it. That is a problem for the literalists to wrestle with. (...) No, not at all, except that you seem to interpret the possiblity of a gay gene (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) And I never once said that you were. But at the same time I note you don't deny it. You have adopted a stance similiar to that of many fundamentalist Christians, and have brought the Bible into this discussion. It seems to me that you don't (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) Idunno - as I said, that's their problem to wrestle with (I am not a literalist). I'm tempted to say the problem is one of their own making, but I am hardly enough of a Bible scholar to actually say that with any certainty. I don't know of (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| (...) Why do you say this? Because Bruce doesn't have the same opinion as you? (...) What do your creations have to do with the debate at hand? (...) Um, what? (...) What does this have to do with anything? How does one person's creations and the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.274)
|
|
| | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| See below too! :) (...) I think it was a basic misunderstanding of what Bruce (who, trust me, holds LEGO in a regard few can hold higher) meant by "not a good collectible." You focussed on it as though he meant that it's not good; he meant that (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.273)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.273)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Since I share Bruce's misgivings on this subject, I'll mention a few thoughts, too. The validity or invalidity of the LP's views is, of course, wholly independent of the racial, cultural, age, or gender makeup of the party, but that's not what (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.273)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Are you implying a causative relation between higher education and some realization that the Libertarian Party is the "correct" path? I'm not trying to misread you, but I want to understand if this is what you're asserting. Regardless (and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.273)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) One thing that I saw as interesting, though I haven't explored the meaning completely, but the chair of the North Carolina Libertarian Party is a woman. She was also their candidate for governor. Of course in the picture on this page: (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.273)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Allow me to elucidate: the LP claims that it aims to help all society, yet the overwhelming majority of LP members are middle class white males. If, as has been asserted, the LP really is (or will be at some indeterminate future time) for the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.272)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.272)
|
|
| | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) Katie, at the risk of enflaming your obvious passion on this issue, have you been reading Bruce's clarifications (and/or mine) of Bruce's original point? He's several times rephrased the original post, but it seems that you're irritated at a (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.272)
|
|
| | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) By her own assertion, though, she "was trying to respond to the "a failing on minorities and women to understand the Libertarian message."" She's responding to a point that wasn't being asserted; in effect, she's having an argument with an (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.272)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
