To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: bruce half irish
 Results 1221 – 1240 of 1868.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
 
(...) Why do you say this? Because Bruce doesn't have the same opinion as you? (...) What do your creations have to do with the debate at hand? (...) Um, what? (...) What does this have to do with anything? How does one person's creations and the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
Thanks Bruce, it's better to understand each other....right on. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
Thanks Bruce, it's better to understand each other....right on. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
Thanks Bruce, it's better to understand each other....right on. Eric (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
 
See below too! :) (...) I think it was a basic misunderstanding of what Bruce (who, trust me, holds LEGO in a regard few can hold higher) meant by "not a good collectible." You focussed on it as though he meant that it's not good; he meant that (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
Hey that's cool Bruce, I got a little out of hand, I re-read the thread and I hear where your comming from, I ussually don't get like that on Lugnet, sorry. You rasied some good points, I hope people can appreciate this as I did. I'm 30, so I feel (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) What Sharon did *ALMOST 50 YEARS AGO* was wrong-- Israel itself is not proud of some of those early day policies. But that was a long, long, time ago. Times have changed, and so has Israel's policies. Citing events that occured almost a half (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

half
(score: 0.333)

  Re: We may all be Lego collectors, but Lego isn't a Beanie-Baby style collectable
 
(...) Great point! From a LEGO builder's point of view, I look at unopened or unused LEGO as a waste of fun, creative and exciting possibilities! I think Eric slightly overdid it in his last post by calling Bruce out, as if creativity makes a (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Is global communication bringing everyone together?
 
An interesting article by George PAcker in NYT - free reg reqd. "In some ways, global satellite TV and Internet access have actually made the world a less understanding, less tolerant place. What the media provide is superficial familiarity -- (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

half
(score: 0.333)

  Re: How talentless IS...?
 
(...) The only good thing about Under Siege is Tommy Lee Jones. I should note that Segal is at least a better actor than the bimbo in that movie (damned with faint praise <g>). I liked Segal in Executive Decision - I got to cheer when he died! (...) (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.333)

  Re: What is Art..(again?) (was:Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?)
 
(...) "Perverse" is an emotionalism in this context so should probably be avoided in a serious debate on the subject. However, when I was younger (goodness gracious--when I was *half* my current age!!!!) I had several friends taking something like (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

half
(score: 0.332)

  Re: Conflict in the Middle East
 
Y'know, these ad hominem attacks are quite annoying. Do y'all think you improve understanding of a pointedly pro-Israel perspective without providing any kind of REAL argument to favor your views? James' original assertions were tripe, practically (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

half
(score: 0.332)

  Re: Conflict in the Middle East
 
"Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Guo8A8.3J7@lugnet.com... (...) probably (...) edge of (...) refugees (...) the (...) the (...) 6-day (...) that (...) shantytown (...) Independence (...) the land (...) Quite a bit of video (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

half
(score: 0.332)

  Re: Zork from Outer Space
 
(...) ? Verbose Maximum verbosity. ? Babel Fish. (computer meltdown ensues....) (23 years ago, 11-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.331)

  Re: Robert: Just another Troll
 
(...) I understand the NBA, as noted before here, and the guy retaliating always getting called for the foul. :-) I take it you didn't make it to the end of message, where I said the following: (...) Happy? Bruce (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.330)

  Re: Conflict in the Middle East
 
(...) their attack on the Jordanian village of Qibya in ‘53. The day after the attack a UN observer said that the IDF had forced civilians to stay in their homes whilst they were demolished around them. 69 civilians were killed - over half of them (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

half
(score: 0.330)

  Re: Robert: Just another Troll
 
(...) I'm still waiting on your cleverness... (...) Not for lack of trying. (...) Hey, I'm just having some fun! I think you need to develop a thicker skin. Note above how *you* are the one claiming *we* (that includes you, junior) are flaming each (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.330)

  Re: Robert: Just another Troll
 
(...) Hahaha. You got ever worse - where's this cleverness you keep gloating about? A Mystic 8-Ball has better comebacks. Concentrate and ask again. (...) I think I missed that same meeting - why are you flaming *everyone*? I'm for one sick of it. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.330)

  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) More sophistries. And yes, I can say it (there it is above). Not only that, I'm right. (...) You failed in your stated purpose. It seems you aren't as clever as you like to think you are. (...) Sometimes known as jerking people around. What's (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.330)

  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) That's a pretty pathetic comeback. I thought you said you are clever - I'd figure you'd use something good for a stock phrase. I'm not impressed. (...) Oh, I'm sorry - you keep telling me how clever you are. I thought you could figure it out. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

bruce
(score: 0.330)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR