To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9874
9873  |  9875
Subject: 
Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:28:56 GMT
Viewed: 
2304 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert Bevens writes:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:49:03 GMT, "Bruce Schlickbernd"
> <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:
> 
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert Bevens writes:
> 
> > > Yeah, you're
> > > right, I'm wrong.  That's what you're really looking for isn't it
> > > James?  No need to feel ashamed if it is, I have no problems in
> > > letting you believe I'm wrong and you're right.
> 
> > There no reason to say this except to let him know that you don't really
> > believe he's right and your wrong, i.e. you *do* have a problem letting him
> > believe you're wrong and he's right.
> > 
> > Bruce
> 
> Ahh, but that's only your interpretation of it, remember, I'm an
> experienced social engineer.  Given that you really can't say what I
> really mean or think.

More sophistries.  And yes, I can say it (there it is above).  Not only
that, I'm right.

> That's not to say I'm trying to manipulate
> anybody, it just means I'm trying to control the way the debate
> unfolds.

You failed in your stated purpose. It seems you aren't as clever as you like
to think you are.


> In these debates I'm often times looking for specific
> emotions and feelings, that way I can better understand my opponents
> position.

Sometimes known as jerking people around.  What's the point when you are
being so transparent about it?  The only person you are fooling is yourself.

> As I said before, I'm a Nihilist, so I don't really have an
> absolute opinion on anything, in either case.  I could just as well be
> arguing the other side of the issue tomorrow, and I probably will.

So you'll be admitting that you were being a fraud tomorrow?  Oh, how
condescending of you.  :-)

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) Let's keep you thinking that way, shall we? (...) I like how you say I failed in my stated purpose, but then fail to explain why. Not that it's any real surprise. (...) If you say so. (...) No, not at all. When I take a side I try to argue and (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) Ahh, but that's only your interpretation of it, remember, I'm an experienced social engineer. Given that you really can't say what I really mean or think. That's not to say I'm trying to manipulate anybody, it just means I'm trying to control (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

126 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR