To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9874
9873  |  9875
Subject: 
Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:28:56 GMT
Viewed: 
850 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert Bevens writes:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:49:03 GMT, "Bruce Schlickbernd"
<corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Robert Bevens writes:

Yeah, you're
right, I'm wrong.  That's what you're really looking for isn't it
James?  No need to feel ashamed if it is, I have no problems in
letting you believe I'm wrong and you're right.

There no reason to say this except to let him know that you don't really
believe he's right and your wrong, i.e. you *do* have a problem letting him
believe you're wrong and he's right.

Bruce

Ahh, but that's only your interpretation of it, remember, I'm an
experienced social engineer.  Given that you really can't say what I
really mean or think.

More sophistries.  And yes, I can say it (there it is above).  Not only
that, I'm right.

That's not to say I'm trying to manipulate
anybody, it just means I'm trying to control the way the debate
unfolds.

You failed in your stated purpose. It seems you aren't as clever as you like
to think you are.


In these debates I'm often times looking for specific
emotions and feelings, that way I can better understand my opponents
position.

Sometimes known as jerking people around.  What's the point when you are
being so transparent about it?  The only person you are fooling is yourself.

As I said before, I'm a Nihilist, so I don't really have an
absolute opinion on anything, in either case.  I could just as well be
arguing the other side of the issue tomorrow, and I probably will.

So you'll be admitting that you were being a fraud tomorrow?  Oh, how
condescending of you.  :-)

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) Let's keep you thinking that way, shall we? (...) I like how you say I failed in my stated purpose, but then fail to explain why. Not that it's any real surprise. (...) If you say so. (...) No, not at all. When I take a side I try to argue and (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) Ahh, but that's only your interpretation of it, remember, I'm an experienced social engineer. Given that you really can't say what I really mean or think. That's not to say I'm trying to manipulate anybody, it just means I'm trying to control (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

126 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR