To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9876
9875  |  9877
Subject: 
Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:35:57 GMT
Reply-To: 
q_harlequin_p@hotmail=StopSpammers=.com
Viewed: 
2351 times
  
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001 02:28:56 GMT, "Bruce Schlickbernd"
<corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:

> > > > Yeah, you're
> > > > right, I'm wrong.  That's what you're really looking for isn't it
> > > > James?  No need to feel ashamed if it is, I have no problems in
> > > > letting you believe I'm wrong and you're right.

> > > There no reason to say this except to let him know that you don't really
> > > believe he's right and your wrong, i.e. you *do* have a problem letting him
> > > believe you're wrong and he's right.
> > > 
> > > Bruce

> > Ahh, but that's only your interpretation of it, remember, I'm an
> > experienced social engineer.  Given that you really can't say what I
> > really mean or think.

> More sophistries.  And yes, I can say it (there it is above).  Not only
> that, I'm right.

Let's keep you thinking that way, shall we?

> > That's not to say I'm trying to manipulate
> > anybody, it just means I'm trying to control the way the debate
> > unfolds.

> You failed in your stated purpose. It seems you aren't as clever as you like
> to think you are.

I like how you say I failed in my stated purpose, but then fail to
explain why.  Not that it's any real surprise.

> > In these debates I'm often times looking for specific
> > emotions and feelings, that way I can better understand my opponents
> > position.

> Sometimes known as jerking people around.  What's the point when you are
> being so transparent about it?  The only person you are fooling is yourself.

If you say so.

> > As I said before, I'm a Nihilist, so I don't really have an
> > absolute opinion on anything, in either case.  I could just as well be
> > arguing the other side of the issue tomorrow, and I probably will.

> So you'll be admitting that you were being a fraud tomorrow?  Oh, how
> condescending of you.  :-)
> 
> Bruce

No, not at all.  When I take a side I try to argue and debate it as if
I do truly believe in it.  I'm not a fraud, I just don't have a set of
beliefs that are written in stone.  I try to redefine my beliefs and
understanding through debating.  However the best way I've found to do
that is to argue against the side I'm actually in agreement with.

Robert



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) That's a pretty pathetic comeback. I thought you said you are clever - I'd figure you'd use something good for a stock phrase. I'm not impressed. (...) Oh, I'm sorry - you keep telling me how clever you are. I thought you could figure it out. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
 
(...) More sophistries. And yes, I can say it (there it is above). Not only that, I'm right. (...) You failed in your stated purpose. It seems you aren't as clever as you like to think you are. (...) Sometimes known as jerking people around. What's (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

126 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR