Debate : Search Results: bruce half irish


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: bruce half irish

Results 1241 – 1260 of 1868.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
(...) Hey! I'm not the apologist, I'm the vile accuser hell-bent to destroy Dr. Sagan's memory! :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
(...) There no reason to say this except to let him know that you don't really believe he's right and your wrong, i.e. you do have a problem letting him believe you're wrong and he's right. Bruce (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Geology from Outer Space
(...) Dang, I answered this one in your email. Everyone will have to be mystified as to my response. :-( Oh, I'll cover the very last point again because it's quick: the Sumerians, Egyptian, and Indians all developed their cultures along a major (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
(...) Yep, you are taking this way too personally. If you want to answer my email personally and discuss it, fine. Bruce (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)
(...) The point is that you attempt to invalidate science on one hand, but it's suddenly valid when it serves your purpose. You do this very thing below. (...) The last willfully misconstrue evidence, take it out of context, ignore what is (...) (23 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
(...) Please reconcile what you just admited he said with what I said. :-) Bruce (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
(...) Heard him say it. Wasn't recorded. Doesn't mean I'm wrong or that Dr. Sagan remembered it. Gosh, you are taking this personally. Bruce (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
(...) Having heard him say it even before Cosmos was made, I can attest he did use the phrase on occasion. Bruce (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Geology from Outer Space
(...) I did. That's a short time, astromically speaking. (...) And......? It's still basic bad science to draw the conclusions you are inmplying. (...) As I mentioned before, recorded Chinese geneaologies go back further than 6,000 years. That's why (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)
This is the same old Creationist dodge: (X) scientific theory isn't PROVEN (nothing is in science - it simply shows you don't understand science when you say such things) so it's just as much an article of faith as religion. Except one is based on (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
(...) I was exaggerating for effect, of course. But yes, he did say billions and billions on occasion. Bruce (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ryan Farrington writes: Other questions also arise, casting doubt (...) Which neatly sums up the corner fundamentalists paint themselves into. The Bible is the literal word of God, no interpreting (which variation of (...) (23 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Carl Sagan's "Cosmos"
(...) Every other word out of his mouth was "billions and billions." He must have said it....billions and billions of times! Bruce (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Geology from Outer Space
(...) I minored in Geology, so most of my knowledge on the subject came from hardcore geology texts. You might want to look in used book stores for the Time-Life series on Geology. Not up-to-date, I'd imagine, but they are far more involved than an (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Geology from Outer Space
(...) This is a rather large subject that I could only cover here in the briefest possible manner. In part, a number of techniques may be combined as double-checks: Known decay rates of radiactivity - Carbon-14 is the best known but there are a (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Geology from Outer Space
(...) Basic bad science. Unwarranted extrapolation of evidence over a very brief period. It's kind of like watching the tide going out, walking away, and declaring the seas will dry up in a year, without any understanding of the ocean's (or sun's) (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Spy plane (was: Why is religion so hot?)
(...) Trolling is what you attempted immediately above: trolling for reactions on the internet rather than trolling for fish in a lake. A "strawman" is not a made-up term: from Encarta Dictionary, "unimportant issue or person: an issue or person of (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: You shoulda seen the Spy plane that got away (and other fish stories)
(...) Lying on the shore with your hook in the water is the laziest. I've had the most success catching fish by trolling. Fly-fishing is the best fishing, except when the fish bother you by getting caught on your hook. The (2nd) bravest fishing I've (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Geology from Outer Space
(...) We've been through this all before. Quote me one established, reputable scientific journal (absolutely no spurious web sites, please) that agrees with your claim. This claim keeps popping up but there has never been an answer to my question. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.330)

		Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
(...) My point exactly. (...) Absolutely. The differences are carefully selected, but this two-party tyranny has blandified elections. On too many issues I couldn't tell Cheney from Lieberman from Dubya from Gore. (...) Again, my point exactly. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

More: Next Page >>