Debate : Search Results: bruce half irish


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: bruce half irish

Results 1261 – 1280 of 1868.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Does God have a name for God?
(...) (URL) ya go... Bruce (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Mega Bloks IPO
I remember reading that roughly 80% of IPOs drop to less than half their IPO price within a year. Generally, not a great investment, unless it was Microsoft. (...) (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

half
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Does God have a name for God?
(...) The "wobble" is not the cause of the seasons, rather it is the angle of the rotational axis relative to the sun during the period the earth revolves about the sun. Bruce (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Does God have a name for God?
(...) Liar, liar, pants on fire... (...) Wait, you just said you weren't being sarcastic at that point. At least keep your story straight. (...) Or so you think. (...) Okay, plausible but specious form of argumentation (or, more bluntly, a load of (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Does God have a name for God?
(...) Read your comments previous to mine above. (...) Same again. If you feel you have to sneer at his website, don't bother with it. Just advice. Feel free to ignore it. (...) I think, therefore I am. Not applicable to all, I'm afraid. Or, as I (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Does God have a name for God?
(...) Actually, that isn't a bad idea! :-) (I mean, that there should be such a "Dummies" book) (...) If you are Catholic. (...) Divinely inspired by God. When quoting the Bible in term papers (biblical scenes being popular in many periods of art), (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
(...) Beware the JubJub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch... Though in this case, like the Snark, the Bandersnatch turned out to be a Boojum. There's a Carrollian logic buried in there somewhere. :-) Bruce (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Does God have a name for God?
(...) "There is no god but Allah." Same God, by the way. Anyway, the question is whether God has a name for God, not whether we have a name for God. I suppose if God invented Aramaic or Arabic, that could be debated (scratching head and pondering (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.329)

		Re: The Free Super Chiefs
(...) As a hypothetical example, if you had ordered $1000 worth of LEGO and it was delivered to me in error, would you accuse me of stealing if I kept it and didn't pay for it? Or how about if I saw three Super Chiefs sitting on a delivery cart and (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

half
(score: 0.329)

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) I don't need to twist things, I even showed you your own words exactly as you wrote them. (...) That's a distortion and misquote right there! I said I did cite your example indirectly but that I "respected your anonymity" by leaving your name (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
(...) Did just that. Bruce (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) away. I'm confused. I expected this to be anti-libertarian and so read sarcasm into it. But I don't think that it's warranted. Are you serious, Bruce? The opinion (sarcastic intent or not) is exactly how I feel. Put the ass of policy makers on (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) Bruce, I have to agree with you. The measure of a company's success is its level of profit - not the level of corruption involved. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
(...) . Or ".monty-python"... Why didn't you post this after Scott's post? It was the usual Scott trick where he makes his political statement in the fun area, and only when he gets called on it does he get in his last word in the same area (so he (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
(...) No, you love to shoot off your mouth about politics (in inappropriate areas) but can't stand it when someone calls you on it. That you don't care for me simply because I pointed out an inaccuracy is par for the course for you. Anything you (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Plagarism in Fantasy Novels? (was Re: Harry Potter?)
(...) Yup, that seems to ring a bell. Anyway, the word "Orc" couldn't really be protected under trademark laws (at least in this country). Bruce (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: What's in a name? ( Potter, Plagiarism, and Trademark)
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: If the word exists, that's one thing, but (...) Yes, Lego would have a case because it would create confusion in the public's mind. Less clear cut would be a recording company and a computer (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Disney actually did this with "Lion King"
(...) As noted above, "perhaps she has a case, perhaps she doesn't." I'm just not going to condemn Rowling based on what Stouffer had to say. Plagiarism, which is what Stouffer is implying to get public sympathy and promote herself, and trademark (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Plagarism in Fantasy Novels? (was Re: Harry Potter?)
(...) Tolkien pretty much did his thing for self-satisfaction rather than packaging something to be "sold" to a popular audience. In any case, Tolkien was interested more in mythology than actual history. I saw Inventing the Middle Ages on a (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

		Re: Plagarism in Fantasy Novels? (was Re: Harry Potter?)
(...) That would seem logical, especially since Tolkien was a Beowulf scholar, but the attributions I have read specifically say it derives from ogre (or was it ogre actually derives from orc - dang, I don't remember). Bruce (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

bruce
(score: 0.328)

More: Next Page >>