|
 | | Re: Art! or Not Art!
|
| (...) Not everyone agrees with you on that, and the proportions that do or don't will change dramatically from culture to culture. (...) else (...) A reasonable desire, but again, "child pornography" means different things to different people. For (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 1.381)
|
|
| | Re: defining art (was "Swearing?")
|
| (...) morals are flawed (...) subjective (...) insight to me. (...) that person than (...) Everything isn't art, but those *you deem* to have flawed morals will accept certain works you consider obscenities. See the difference? You make the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.381)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.380)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.380)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.379)
|
|
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
| (...) I've heard and read "Environmental Extremists" plenty of times, if only because it alliterates. Radical, fringe, zealot, and fanatic all carry perjorative images in any case. Bruce (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.379)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.379)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) They were on the toll walkway (no public sidewalks) and fell there as they died. Smugglers aren't involved because they weren't restricted at the border. Actually, they died on your neighbor's property, but he dragged the corpses over to yours (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) centralized (...) Why in the world are you running on about it? I don't understand. It was just the shortest-to-explain-example that the guy was walking on some public area. Mountain out of a molehill. (...) Mountain. Molehill. (...) I can't (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) You tell me. It could equally be war, persecution, bad weather as crop failure. (...) As long as they were still physically capable of work, what does it matter? (...) You are confusing wanting to and actually getting work swiftly enough or (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) Hey, no way! I left the country! It's on YOUR property. :-) Further, for the example, it is important that it happens on your property. Now if you can ever prove that your neighbor (...) Already addressed: You can't prove it. And it happened (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| | Re: Larry isn't amusing
|
| (...) The preceeding line did not appear in Larry's original message, and the way it appears it seems to be written by him. This is not the case. I'm not quite sure how it got there, but I have double-checked, and he did not say it. I wish to (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.378)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) No, I said it wasn't intended to be taken seriously. I was refering to my example only. But after thinking about it, I decided it may have legitimate repurcussions. My point really is that there can be a cost to a society by having an open (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.377)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) or (...) Toppling stiff? I don't know why, but that phrase gives me the giggles. I love it. "Dear, there's another toppling stiff out by the jacaranda. Do you think you could pop out and clean things up a bit before the Burgess's arrive? (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.377)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.377)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) Larry, you cut the attrib to Richard, so you make it look like I was saying that to you (wiggle). Further, you cut the part that prompted my response (wiggle). The part was more critical of the person I was responding to (wiggle). That person (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.377)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) I take it you don't read your own messages. You have outwiggled me the whole way. (...) For someone who doesn't understand, you summed it up pretty accurately. You basically said if their is no public assistance then there can be no objection (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.377)
|
