To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3991
3990  |  3992
Subject: 
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 23:52:18 GMT
Viewed: 
5326 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>  <Foyq1t.BEt@lugnet.com> <FoysHv.tu@lugnet.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> 
> > All true.  All undisputed.  Too bad ya can't prove it.  :-)
> 
> Mostly, I just can't FOLLOW it.
> 
> > Alright.  I made up the toll walkway, but I figured that in a Libertarian
> > society you had to have some way of getting about not provided by a • centralized
> > tax-driven body.
> 
> Yes. Toll walkways may well exist. And, property owners may choose to
> provide free walkways as well, either because they find strollers
> aesthetically pleasing, or because they want to give access to their
> stores, or because the value of that walkway is low enough to make it
> uneconomical to collect tolls, or because the property association
> decided to fund the walkway collectively (as condos now do to pay for
> sidewalks or common area driveways) or any of a number of other reasons.
> 
> But I'm not sure what point you're making here. Were you looking for
> someone to claim that toll walkways would not exist? Not me! Is the toll
> germane to the example? Please elaborate.

Why in the world are you running on about it?  I don't understand.  It was just
the shortest-to-explain-example that the guy was walking on some public area.
Mountain out of a molehill.

> 
> Note that if one pays a toll for a toll walkway, one is bound by the
> terms and conditions the walkway owner imposes, as is the walkway owner.
> If one voluntarily uses a free walkway, one again is bound by terms and
> conditions. If one feels one is not bound, then one is trespassing and
> subject to ejection.

Mountain.  Molehill.

> 
> I'd have a tendency to presume that a reasonable condition might be that
> if I happen to die on your walkway after paying the toll I can expect
> that your workers will collect my body and present it to my next of kin,
> if any, for proper disposal.

I can't follow this at all.  The body is over there on
your/Frank's/whomever-I'm-talking-to's lawn.  Not on the
tollway/walkway/association's-way/whomever's-way.

Bruce



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
<Foyq1t.BEt@lugnet.com> <FoysHv.tu@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Mostly, I just can't FOLLOW it. (...) Yes. Toll walkways may well exist. And, property owners may choose to provide free (...) (27 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR