Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 16:58:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1319 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> For the most part today, poor children don't have much of a chance.
> Sure, they theoretically get the same education that other kids do, but
> the reality is they don't. Some advantages I see in a Liberatopia
> include:
>
> - less waste on money on kids who aren't going to learn
> - tailoring the schools for poor kids to produce poor kids
> who can at least qualify for some kind of job, and probably
> don't even run as long as high school, if they're just going
> to do unskilled labor, why not get them out there making money
> earlier?
(Banging head against wall) Why oh why was I so silly as to begin reading this
thread. Why not just tie 'em to the land and call them serfs? Heck, let's
admit that they'll never amount to anything and put them in factories at age 6.
Let's stratify society as much as possible. Social mobility? Trash that.
I'll have left the country before the riots start.
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
