Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 7001 – 7020 of 11764.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
(...) us to bite the hook. The best solution is for all of us to let this go and move on. Obviously we[1] should agree to disagree on on certain issues and move on. Face it the owner of Brickshelf has spoken so the time for debate is over. Don't (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) I can only imagine you are confusing my opinion on avatar images (and I include all avatar images, not just Bionicle ones) with my opinion on Bionicle MOCs. I have not bashed any Lego line in this thread, nor have I bashed any MOCs. Whether I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
"Jon Palmer" <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in message news:GpJ9nA.M6F@lugnet.com... (...) far (...) post (...) Tolerate the avatars, please! They are so easy to ignore. Don't blow _them_ out of proportion. I find yet-another-mecha about as exciting (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) It's not a problem, it is a choice. The free sites offer their service without stipulation for people to use. Brickshelf is there for all Lego aficionados. Warning* I am going off an a tangent- Lugnet has virtually ignored Bionicle fans. (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) Um, yes. The version of BZ that we are running now never hosted avatars. We offer standard avatars for all users to use, and if they want to use a custom avatar, then they have to find an external pic hosting site. Even members who pay do not (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
Hi Dave! Nice to hear from you :-) See you next month.... "Dave Johann" <legomecha@adelphia.net> wrote in message news:GpLDLH.5BB@lugnet.com... (...) But - does the Brickshelf viewership - at least those who do not like the images - need to be (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) Unfornently, NO, it's NOT! I don't know about you, but I prefer to hit that button once maybe twice to catch up on what I've missed. Now though, I find myself hitting the button 5 or 6 times. Granted that isn't a lot, but it all becomes very (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Try for summary of this debate...
(...) I'd like to highlight this a bit more. I think it would be a big mistake to make any value judgements based on popularity contests for what content is allowed. A "highlights" page which brought forth folders or images which are highly rated (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Try for summary of this debate...
(...) Absolutely agreed. I think we've got to be careful about how we talk about the bandwidth issue until we have hard data. (...) I definitely agree with the above. (...) Umm, isn't a 9 year old breaking Brickshelf's TOS no matter what he/she (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
(...) Are you trying to say I did this? If you are saying that I did this please be man enough and say it. I noticed you left out any names on your 'thoughtfull' post. For the record, I did not put any pictres up on brickshelf, but if your (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
The title of this should be 'Jon trying to change and cleanup what he said" (...) it was a 'I do not like these, so lets get rid of them' post. (taken from your first post on this) "These Avatar images (etc..) seem to pertain to a website called (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) LOL, is anyone an admin of brickshelf? of course not, but I believe there should be. We need some people to weed out all the junk that gets posted on there. Now, whether these avatars are considered junk or not is up to Kevin. (...) I love (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Try for summary of this debate...
(...) Just looking at the size of these, they seem negligible even compared to the stuff in my own folders. So I don't think bandwidth is a huge factor. The main beef I would have is that they put each one in a separate folder (which you talk about (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) Ouch! I had not heard that particular turn of phrase before and the vision it brings me is not a pain free one in any way shape or form. That is the only reason I set XFUT to .fun... to share that vision with y'all. If you feel like (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) My reasons for feeling they are abuse is due to the drowning out of content I, and other fans I speak to on a regular basis, am interested in, the bandwidth issues, and their general appearance. Frankly, I think they're ugly. I wouldn't (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) Your felling they are abuse is because you do not like them, and they take up space for items you do like. Just so happens that there are many of these items you do not like. But they are lego related, like it or not - they are lego related (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
I'm sorry I've posted outside the origninal thread but there are now far too many posts that I'd like to respond to and this seems like the most painless way to do so. Thanks to everyone who has seen my post for what it was. I think there have been (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) I think it is abuse because it seems like they're always some new ones, usually in the same folders or by the same people, they are of no interest to anyone I know browsing the recent page, and they are not showcasing models or ideas or Lego (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
It seems that I might be stepping into a personality conflict between these two that pre-exists this discussion. Is that the case? (...) Too many capitalized words will dilute your point...whatever it was. (...) You go on to discuss how one makes (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

		Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
(...) Do you really need my answer to that? (...) Like or dislike, adding alot of value vs. adding little value does not factor into it, they are lego-related images. Like it or not, they are. And Brickshelf is such a place to host Lego related (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.234)

More: Next Page >>