|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.537) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.537) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.536) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.536) |
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Yes, and I've seen other such texts. I certainly wouldn't want a one-world government like that, and that's not what I'm advocating at all! (...) Ok, now we're back to the rights discussion. I don't see how a corporation gets the right to do (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.536) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.536) |
|
| | Re: Swearing?
|
| (...) I'm not convinced that it's all that clear cut. I have observed age-peers of mine who are markedly less worldly and make stupid decisions about their lives. At what magic age is one fully capable of making decisions such that we can (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.535) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.534) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.534) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.534) |
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) has (...) Ooh, even before I got better, I would never have supported this... (...) otherwise (...) sponsered (...) any (...) I used to have this opinion. My feeling now is that anything worthwhile that the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.534) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.534) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.534) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.533) |
|
| | Re: True Right Wing Fascists
|
| (...) Right. And some christians are nazi fascists. You don't like being lumped in with them - that's all I'm saying. It's important to recognize the shades of distinction and not address people as if they represented all that was wrong with a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.533) |
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) IMO, shareholders and the purchacing power of a few knowledgable consumers isn't enough to control corperations. What are the evils that corperations *could* do, if they were allowed? * Education - biased or limited, creating clones to work in (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.533) |
|
| | Re: RFC: An Alternative..
|
| (...) Which flow of money? Apart from the minimal tax (admistration+State Responsibility fees (which pays for national defence and other things of that nature)), the flow of money is entirely up to the aggregate group. Ie, a community, town, region, (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.533) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.532) |
|
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
| Richard, I am not being argumentative just for the sake of it. I am truly having difficulty seeing your side of this, and as is usually the case, wondering why you can't see mine. I made some replies below that I would like you to look at. I am (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.532) |
|
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
| (...) I'll give it my best go. (...) I agree - because once you have Social Groupings that organise their own affairs independently, there won't be *MUCH* that you'd need *EVERYONE* to vote on at one time? (...) Well, if that means that you think my (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.532) |