Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 03:47:51 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm/nospam/.org
|
Viewed:
|
1286 times
|
| |
|
|
John DiRienzo <ig88888888@stlnet.com> wrote:
> were, before, either. The reason I've been so impolite in these past few
> posts (moreso than is typical for my normally cynical self) is because every
> post (from you and others) I read in this thread that was against what I
> believe has been filled with sarcasm and ridicule. And, mostly you have
Yes, I posted some things in a sarcastic tone. That doesn't mean I wasn't
serious. But the fact that you weren't amused underlines the point that we
disagree at an extremely basic level. So discussing the question of rights
makes a lot of sense.
If you want to allude to state-controlled totalitarian distopias, I probably
will see the humor in it. Despite your label of "commie", I don't advocate a
state-controlled society (which is what I take it you mean by that) and I
don't think I've suggested that as a solution at all.
But really: let's look at the basic issues of rights first, at the bare
stand-alone level, and see where that gets us.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
