Results 4381 – 4400 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
 | | Re: The partisian trap in California
|
| (...) Arnold claims in one breath that he does not deny all the stories about grabbing and immediately continues that "this is not (him)." Well, if he admits he did it, then it is him. What is this fairy tale that it isn't. He wants to imply that (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: More of the Usual Lies
|
| (...) With him so far.... (...) This was the part where I thought he veered off into foaming a bit.. (...) Don't you just hate it when people who clearly are weasely lying sniveling gits(1) might actually be right about just about everything they (...) (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Me too. Recall: Yes Replacement: McClintock -- this election is all about the state economy and he's the only one who has had direct answers to every question about the economy. 53: No. Dumb idea. This would just further tie the hands of any (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Impeach Bush now
|
| Impeach Bush now Unmasking a CIA agent is bad, lying to Congress worse. With each U.S. death in Iraq, the case against the President grows stronger, says JOHN MacARTHUR (URL) Now that the U.S. government's chief weapons inspector in Iraq has, in (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) I'll just take that as another sacarasm. (...) Again, I'm going to note Hardball on MSNBC. Arnorld has something no one else up there showed- charasima! If there is one thing I have seen all so often in this life (I was one of those teens who (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) We are the chorus, and we agree, we agree, we agree, we agree - Bored of the Rings (...) No, we dismiss the anonymous simply because they are anonymous. I don't have a clue as to who they are. I at least knew beforehand who Arnold was, I could (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Recall: no. Misuse of the recall procedure. Replace with: Peter Camejo (Green Party, No. 65 on the ballot) 53: No 54: No (...) No substance, all style. Doubt me? Look at how you refer to Arnold. :-) Here's my summation of Things to Come: (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Honestly, I dismissed most of them for pretty much the same reason - I didn't know their name simply because they were not seriously running for governor. And let's add to that I dismissed the names that were similiar to better known people (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Absolute political unknown. I had presumed that you would be able to identify the term within the context of the discussion, but I see that I am in error. You dismissed a range of other candidates just because you didn't know their names. This (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Gee, that's a fairly pathetic rationale in my view. Is that the way you keep track of your bank account -- instinct? Arnold is worse than business as usual. He is a puppet backed all the way from D.C. to Enron. Didn't you know? Always follow (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Character flaws? If true, the actions described are generally in the way of sexual assault. I might have a bad temper -- yeah, that's bad. But if I grope your wife, daughter, brother, son, or even you -- I've probably committed a crime! (...) (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Alright, let's run this the other way. Another recall happens, only this time it is Arnie. 51% vote yes. 49% vote no. So, in fact, only 51% get to determine who the new governor is. And you can bet that most of that 49% who don't get to vote (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) Green Bionicle is "underloved" (1), I hear, so yaay for Peter I guess. 1 - There are always 6 different figures in each of the waves, and each one is a different color... Supposedly Red always sells out first (across all the lines so far, (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| (...) 53 - NO 54 - NO Recall - NO Replacement - Peter Camejo, that Green Bionicle lover Hanging chads - NO, first time I ever bothered to check "I Voted" sticker - NO I had headed out to the polls feeling kinda disenfranchised-- no one ever pleaded (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
|
| I just got my "I Voted" sticker. Well, my vote has been made and I'll pass them along. I would like to hear from the rest of LUGNET's Californians. Recall- YES. Replace with- "The Terminator" Prop 53- YES Prop 54- NO Prop 53 and 54 didn't get all (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: Next step... (was Re: Interesting idea...?!)
|
| (...) also, but it's such a beautiful place too. Its one of my favorite states along interstate 80. Anyway, I haven't promised anyone anything -- but if the Libertarian party takes over I might just move there. It won't be worse than Shrub et al (...) (21 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Al-qaida/Iraq link, or not?
|
| All hail Governor Bush for coming clean with (URL) this bit> of useful info despite what Cheney was still parroting just days before. And to hear Dubya tell it, he can't understand why a majority of the American people continue to believe that (...) (21 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
|
| | Re: The partisian trap in California
|
| (...) Let it, and let him address each one. I have a feeling that after tomorrow, the issue will become mute (sic), because most of the allegations are beyond the statute of limitations (so at best they would get an apologize which he has already (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.296)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
