Results 3521 3540 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Re: Reading in steep decline?
|
| (...) The way I heard it was, around 1450 or so, a learned scientist did a study on the phenomenon, which supported the claim, but since he was not really happy with the results, his method of "publishing" was to ask his son to memorise the whole (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Mormon bashing again
|
| Arg. I gotta vent. Slashdot is carrying an article (1) on how the Utah legislature is trying to enfore internet filtering in public libraries. Somehow, this topic has become a Mormon-bashing extravaganza. I was going to post there, but I suspect (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Truth and consequences?
|
| It's been about nine months, and I've begun to wonder: Why isn't Bob Novak in jail? I don't criticize him for protecting his informant, but whether or not Novak reveals his source, Novak himself still violated national security by revealing Valerie (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Win-win-win?
|
| (...) Well that has failed. The WMD are apparently AWOL, the whole country looks like a giant terrorist recruiting centre and it is clear that the "threat" to us all is (URL) increasing>! (...) Yep. We killed >10,000, put new torturers in the (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) I'm talking about *today* (...) I mean Bush has engineered a situation whereby OBLs foot soldiers are apparently crawling all over Iraq... a country apparently full of WMD! (...) Nice try. I did not say that. (What is your point?) (...) I (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) If you do think he had WMD, are you not concerned that Bush has engineered a situation whereby OBLs foot soldiers are apparently crawling all over the country? Scott A (20 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
|
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) I stand corrected. I noticed my gaff after I posted:-( Though it isn't your stance, it is a common misconception that is held. I apologize for attributing it to you:-) (...) Our main objective was eliminating a dangerous threat in the person (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.323) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Name all those that you feel see it as "obvious", subtract that from everyone else, and you will have "a great deal". (...) Seems obvious even to you that is NOT about freeing the people of Iraq, but controlling the flow of oil (which was (...) (20 years ago, 28-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.322) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Actually, I'd say your misquote of me is the gross distortion (see the first line in the quote sequence for the correct claim). :-) (...) I still don't see what your point is here beyond controlling that flow (your original point was how it (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.322) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Awww. "Haliburton" again???? (...) Awww. More "puppet" talk? (...) We always could, even from SH if we wanted! (...) But that is precisely my point-- OBL was acting independently from the policies of his country, so equating the nationality of (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.322) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) John's right. Haliburton will make it's money just from infrastructure contracts, the oil in this case is almost secondary. And anyway, the puppet democrazy that we establish isn't going to be hostile to us even if the people are. So we'll get (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.322) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) The last time I looked Bush: had ~140,000 troops in Iraq. had installed a dictator in iraq. was conducting show trials there. If that is not control, what is? (...) ...and where is that oil flowing to? Your "SUV" perhaps? (...) I'm not (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.322) |
|
| | Re: Some wins for freedom from the Supremes
|
| (...) Mmmm, and just when I was thinking that we should quit the allegiance to the Queen thingie, and get all republicy. Particularly me with my pro-Irish sentiments. It turns out that we have already essentially signed up as a US state (and a (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.322) |
|
| | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) Fine; put it this way: there are a great deal of countries on both sides. Saying "the world clearly thinks it isn't obvious" is a gross distortion. (...) Not controlling the flow of oil (or do you have cites for that?), but enabling the free (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| all (score: 0.322) | More: Next Page >>
|