To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24617
24616  |  24618
Subject: 
Re: Fair use and allusion?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 08:08:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1602 times
  
  
   I still don’t see what your point is here beyond controlling that flow (your original point was how it was obvious that this was all about freeing the Iraqis, yet still admit it was about the oil one way or the other).

Our main objective was eliminating a dangerous threat in the person of SH (via WMD proliferation mainly...

If you do think he had WMD, are you not concerned that Bush has engineered a situation whereby OBL’s foot soldiers are apparently crawling all over the country?

Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Fair use and allusion?
 
(...) Along with everybody else. (...) What exactly do you mean? Yes, there are terrorists there to attack Americans. But can you not see that we are not the only targets? What if, tomorrow, we were to evacuate completely from Iraq? Do you think (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Fair use and allusion?
 
(...) I stand corrected. I noticed my gaff after I posted:-( Though it isn't your stance, it is a common misconception that is held. I apologize for attributing it to you:-) (...) Our main objective was eliminating a dangerous threat in the person (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR