|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.333) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.330) |
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ... (...) even (...) Yep, and we collectively agreed that the more successful people would do the major part in paying these taxes. Against their will (and rights) of course. (...) can't (...) People who are on (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.328) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.326) |
|
| | Re: Quiet in here
|
| (...) radical (...) No more than you meant that anyone religious is a right wing extremist. The problem in this matter is that only the outrageous get the attention and taint the entire issue. (...) Morality tanscends the state. It's not just a (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.317) |
|
| | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) Ouch, Larry. >:-P (...) I know it was a joke, but bear with me for a moment... Would Libertarians be tolerant of my lifestyle if I were to become a tyrranical conquorer bent upon stamping out Libertarianism and setting up camp on your private (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.311) |
|
| | Re: Trying to understand
|
| Well plowed ground alert. (...) You do. Or you should. It's not my problem if you didn't manage your affairs correctly. Maybe I'll decide to help, but it should be my decision. Medical care is a good, that is, a form of property. There are no rights (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.311) |
|
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
| (...) I'm not sure, but is what you are envisioning, like firearms rights insurance? Where the licensing authority would be liable for misuse of the firearms by holders of their license? (...) Do you mean at the time of purchase? Presumably the (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.289) |
|
| | Re: Age limitations
|
| (...) Erik said the magic word. Give that man a hundred dollars (on a tile). (...) I'm not sure it has. And I'm with Erik on this. Those with vested interests, and therefore those with standing to decide, are the NELUG members, and only the NELUG (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.270) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 3.265) |
|
| | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
|
| (...) I was not trying to hide that Larry. And I did alert any readers to that fact - which is what you chose not to answer my questions. That aside, looking at the tone of some of the LP aims, I feel that they do not care too much for the rights of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 3.265) |
|
| | Re: Misnomer: we are all Lego collectors!
|
| (...) Sorry, not my intent...just adding the missing dictionary definitions. (...) Complaints can be forwarded to: -The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 3.234) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 3.227) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.224) |
|
| | LP POINT 2
|
| LP POINT 2 Larry If an individual were to find him/herself in your propertyist dreamland with no food, no water, no education, no money, no property and starving. What rights would he/she have? Which right would be strongest: 1. The right of the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.218) |
|
| | Re: LP POINT 3
|
| (...) I'm hardly Libertarian, but I think I can field a few of these: (...) Sure, as one is able to discriminate now, based on race. Not currently in terms of employment or pay, but the right to associate or not to associate is spelled out very (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.216) |
|
| | Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) If you rummage around, youll find that there are plenty within the LP who voice decent at every thing from your sign up clause (I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals.), to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.215) |
|
| | Re: Is space property?
|
| (...) Hi Erik, I'm not sure I follow. I just went back and reread my note, looking for unclarity or definitionless terms. The only thing that I really came up with is the concept of rights. Rights are definately up in the air as far as a definition. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.214) |
|
| | Re: New Brickbay promotion
|
| (...) He is correct. From Dictionary.com: gyp also gip (jp) Slang tr.v. gypped, also gipped gyp·ping, gip·ping gyps, gips To deprive (another) of something by fraud; cheat or swindle. n. 1. A fraud or swindle. 2. One who defrauds; a swindler. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 3.213) |
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) Many people are "exploited" if you define it widely enough. Isn't being an employee exploitation? Actually, weren't you being exploited by the system when you were going to school for free? You were being incented by the masses to behave in a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.211) |