Subject:
|
Re: Is space property?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Dec 2000 10:58:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
191 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Erik Olson writes:
> Chris, you're hypothesizing in the absence of definitions.
Hi Erik,
I'm not sure I follow. I just went back and reread my note, looking for
unclarity or definitionless terms. The only thing that I really came up with
is the concept of rights. Rights are definately up in the air as far as a
definition. But is that what you meant?
Also, I'm not exactly hypothesizing. I'm trying to clear up some internal
thought-clarity issues and I've found that bouncing ideas around the smart
people here is a good way to do that.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Is space property?
|
| (...) Well, yeah, that's the central concept, isn't it? If you're trying to apply and extend a concept but you don't really know what it is to start with, muddle will result. (The irony is that you're trying to go into space when it is grounding (...) (24 years ago, 26-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
