| |
LP POINT 2
Larry
If an individual were to find him/herself in your propertyist dreamland with
no food, no water, no education, no money, no property and starving. What
rights would he/she have? Which right would be strongest:
1. The right of the property owner to shoot him/her for trespass
2. The right to sustenance?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LP POINT 2
|
| (...) One point at a time, sorry. But in the meantime, you can either apply first principles and derive your own answer, or you can read old threads, where something very like this was discussed, at length. Check your assumptions, though. They (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: LP POINT 2
|
| (...) Quick answer, for closure. Under a property rights analysis, there is no right to sustenance, per se. There is a right to offer to trade for or pay for or ask for charitiable sustenance but no requirement that anyone in particular actually (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
