| |
Larry, you are deleting my points rather than answering them.
Scott A
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:G4p2qs.K9o@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > LP POINT 2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > > If an individual were to find him/herself in your propertyist dreamland • with
> > > > no food, no water, no education, no money, no property and starving. • What
> > > > rights would he/she have? Which right would be strongest:
> > > >
> > > > 1. The right of the property owner to shoot him/her for trespass
> > > > 2. The right to sustenance?
> > >
> > > One point at a time, sorry.
>
> What's so hard to understand about one point at a time? Did you want to • give
> up on your other two for now and talk about this one? I am taking them in
> your numbering order.
>
> This bears repeating, though...
>
> > > But in the meantime, you can either apply first principles and derive • your
> > > own answer, or you can read old threads, where something very like this • was
> > > discussed, at length.
>
> as does this...
>
> > > Check your assumptions, though. They aren't clearly stated.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LP POINT 2
|
| (...) What's so hard to understand about one point at a time? Did you want to give up on your other two for now and talk about this one? I am taking them in your numbering order. This bears repeating, though... (...) as does this... (...) ++Lar (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
