| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> LP POINT 2
>
>
> Larry
> If an individual were to find him/herself in your propertyist dreamland with
> no food, no water, no education, no money, no property and starving. What
> rights would he/she have? Which right would be strongest:
>
> 1. The right of the property owner to shoot him/her for trespass
> 2. The right to sustenance?
One point at a time, sorry.
But in the meantime, you can either apply first principles and derive your
own answer, or you can read old threads, where something very like this was
discussed, at length.
Check your assumptions, though. They aren't clearly stated.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LP POINT 2
|
| (...) This is an easy one Larry - One or Two, whats is gonna be? Would a starving man/woman have a right to food? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | LP POINT 2
|
| LP POINT 2 Larry If an individual were to find him/herself in your propertyist dreamland with no food, no water, no education, no money, no property and starving. What rights would he/she have? Which right would be strongest: 1. The right of the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
