Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 2101 – 2120 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist Anyone can say anything about anyone else
(...) Hi, all-- This is yet another example of why one's faith should color one's decisions. I make a living working for a Bible School. I would be considered "Evangelical" and/or "Conservative" by a good many people. I attend church when I'm not on (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.417)

		Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
(...) May I ask why the drinking age in the US is 21? Do any other rights/privileges accrue at that age, or is everything else 16/18+? Or is alcohol thought to be such a dangerous drug that it shouldn't be used while someone is still in their teens? (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.417)

		Re: The Brick Testament reActs
Hi, Nathan. (...) So noted. :) Though I've moved this to ot.debate because it isn't really a discussion of the LEGO constructions themselves nor how I've chosen to illustrate Bible passages with LEGO. (...) Hmm. I actually thought it was one of the (...) (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.417)

		Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
(...) Because US Congress, overstepping their bounds as usual, attatched a conditional to highway funds so that if a state had a lower drinking age than 21, they would not get the highway funds. (Of course the money comes from the citizens of the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.417)

		Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist Anyone can say anything about anyone else
(...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the individual can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.417)

		Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist Anyone can say anything about anyone else
(...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the individual can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.417)

		I don't think the Southern Baptist Anyone can say anything about anyone else
(URL) Tennessee (AP) -- A Southern Baptist leader said Tuesday that evangelical voters might tolerate a divorced presidential candidate, but they have deep doubts about GOP hopeful Rudy Giuliani, who has been married three times. " Yeah, and i have (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.417)

		Re: National vote on handguns?
(...) Yes, more than previously, not than expected. Is it possible that it would have been a 80% (or anything over 40%) increase in case there were NO restrictions on weaponry? Crime has a natural tendency to rise, in any situation - maybe (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.417)

		Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist Anyone can say anything about anyone else
(...) I read it later and I should have specified that--one does not need to be perfect to criticise. However, people pointing out that Rudy is bad because of his divorces (however public they may have been) when they themselves have sexual (...) (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.417)

		Re: National vote on handguns?
(...) Right. One good thing Scott did, long ago, was provide a link to David Friedman's(1) site, which among many other good things, provides a good example of how natural rights don't always work out, and then demonstrates how you can use a cost (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: National vote on handguns?
(...) good to know of an electronic source. Bastiat is cited by a lot of other freedom thinkers. One issue that some will have is that his derivation of why people have the rights they do is pretty weak. I know it always comes up here if you just (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
Now that I have my ability to post again... The whole idea of gun control (regardless of what the majority belive) is uncostitutional. Our founding father's in their infinite wisdom drafted the constitution to protect everyone's rights from the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: Nature of rights? (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
(...) No. An ability determines the claim to a right. Back up a few decades for a moment... it would be pure foolishness for me to claim the right of flight as I do not have the ability to fly...now, return to the present... I still do not have the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
(...) I am saying I do not care about the lions morals. Saying a lion has no morals, is like saying it cannot drive a car - it is irrelevant. I view calling a lion “amoral” as negative, as it is saying it has not got what we view as being “good”. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: National vote on handguns?
(...) I support the process, but reserve the right to bolt if I don't like the outcome... (...) This is my problem with this proposal as well. I think you have to have basic rights that are much harder to revoke than just majority rule. I've said it (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
(...) Including me I think. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
(...) Not by my watch. If you were unclear on the issue you probably should've asked Larry what he meant by amoral. Otherwise, you must explain what definition you though Larry was using, explain why it's not what you're saying, AND explain the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: Nature of rights? (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
(...) I would speculate, along with Larry, that animals do not have a system of rights in the same form as humans do. But I don't think we invented the condition of rights as much as they revealed themselves to us through nature. Do you think this (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: National vote on handguns?
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes: <snip> WELL SAID, froggy friend. I have one tiny point of confusion... I had always heard Jefferson, et. al., referred to as a "classical liberal" rather than a "radical conservative". I suspect (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

		Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
(...) By referencing the dietary constraint issue, are you talking about my ethical stance on vegetarianism? You are claiming that there is a difference between protecting lives and dietary restriction, but my dietary restriction does protect lives. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.416)

More: Next Page >>