Subject:
|
Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:34:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
157 times
|
| |
|
|
Now that I have my ability to post again...
The whole idea of gun control (regardless of what the majority belive) is
uncostitutional. Our founding father's in their infinite wisdom drafted the
constitution to protect everyone's rights from the tyranny of the majority.
The major flaw with the idea of gun control is that in does not actually work
the way the masses are led to belive it would. If total gun control were
instituted, it would serve to insure that only criminals would have guns.
Understand that well over 90 percent of guns used in crimes are not obtained
legally anyway. I am not a member of the NRA nor do I support them, but I do
agree with the NRA's one core belief. Guns should not be punished, criminals
should. The fact that over 10,000 crimes a year involve guns is the staple
statistic of the Gun Control advocates. Of course they conviently ignore the
fact that over 2 million crimes are prevented every year by armed citizens.
Gun Control advocates no doubt pretend that statistic is NRA propaganda.
The three biggest supporters of Gun Control in the 20th century are: Adolf
Hittler, Joe Stalin, and that Chineese guy whose name I cannot even pronounce
let alone spell. Sarah Brady (founder of Handgun Control Inc.) was qouted in
the 80's stating: "Socialist America cannot be realized untill those who would
oppose us have been totally disarmed." I personally would love to know why
everyone pretends she never said that. The common response to the
aforementioned is along the lines of: "Nazi America, that's preposterous."
The United States Gun Control Act of 1968 is virtually word for word identical
to the translated Nazi Weapons Law of 1938. The main thing this law
establishes in the government registration of firearms. (Jewish handgun owners
were among the first to be rounded up.)
I have read journalists' columns about how the right to bear arms is not a
significant right like free speach or freedom of the press. They are mindless
puppets. The right to bear arms is the single most important right. It alone
empowers the people to protect the rest of their rights.
There are 3 types of laws that I abide by. The first and fore most is God's
law. The second is constitutional law. The third is common saftey law (traffic
laws for example) A common saftey law is only valid if it does not contradict
constitutional law. Constitiutional law must not contradict God's law.
Everything else does not apply to anyone as far as I am concerned. For the
most part what occurs in D.C. is hot air with no sustenance. Fortunately for
me and everyone else remotly concered with our individual rights the majority
will never be able to take them away. For that we must give thanks to our
founding fathers.
-Mike Petrucelli
WARNING! Short rant follows, read at your own risk.
The correct translation from Hebrew is "Thou shalt not murder." As murder is
defined as killing an innocent, it is impossible to murder a criminal.
Personally I am still trying to figure out why it is illegal to fire an RPG at
a car conducting a drive-by shooting. Ah well what should I expect from a
society that belives convicted murderers have rights.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
16 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
