Subject:
|
Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Jul 2001 16:10:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1235 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > > > Now that I have my ability to post again...
> > > >
> > > > The whole idea of gun control (regardless of what the majority belive) is
> > > > uncostitutional.
> > >
> > > If you are correct, why not just make it costitutional?
> >
> > Because Gun Control is wrong.
>
> What do you mean it is "wrong"? Is everynation which has gun control (I
> expect most do) wrong then?
By Wrong I mean it is unconstitutional in the USA. I explained why it is wrong
beyond that in my original post.
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
| (...) It's wrong for the context of the United States. Small-arms control may be just dandy for other countries, but the US isn't another country. The Constitution is part of the reason, but it is in itself not enough justification--the Constitution (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
