Subject:
|
Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:32:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
304 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > > > > > > Now that I have my ability to post again...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The whole idea of gun control (regardless of what the majority belive) is
> > > > > > > uncostitutional.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you are correct, why not just make it costitutional?
> > > > >
> > > > > Because Gun Control is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > What do you mean it is "wrong"? Is everynation which has gun control (I
> > > > expect most do) wrong then?
> > >
> > > By Wrong I mean it is unconstitutional in the USA. I explained why it is • wrong
> > > beyond that in my original post.
> >
> > So it is not "wrong" then?
>
> Well if by "wrong" one means, morally, then no. If by "wrong" one means, not a
> good idea, then yes. (After reading Lindsay's post I relized I needed to
> clarify my statement) I realize that my position is a minority one in this
> discussion. However I have yet to hear (anywhere not just Lugnet) a reason for
> Gun Control that has any merit. Gun Control only affects law abiding citizens.
> It will never stop a criminal.
It is evident that the levels of gun use you enjoy in the USA is not
stopping criminals either. Do you not think for one second that gun control
may have the ability to reduce the numbers of guns which reach the hands of
criminals? Do you not think that it would have the ability to reduce the
numbers of accidental shootings or even the amount of suicides?
Scott A
>
> -Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
| (...) One can obtain a gun illegally more easily than one can legally. If the legal means were eliminated logically only criminals would have guns then. (...) It probably would reduce accidental shootings by persons that own a firearm but do not (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Gun Control, Unnessesary Evil
|
| (...) wrong (...) Well if by "wrong" one means, morally, then no. If by "wrong" one means, not a good idea, then yes. (After reading Lindsay's post I relized I needed to clarify my statement) I realize that my position is a minority one in this (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
