Subject:
|
Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 03:19:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1410 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > What is it that makes someone conceited for making such a
> > judgement, and what is it that makes someone NOT conceited for making that
> > same judgement?
>
> We may be viewed as being conceited for passing judgement on another
> culture. But if, say, it is to protect lives- that it is worth being called
> conceited. There is a world of difference between that and passing judgement
> on an individual for having, say, no dietary constraint or being gay.
By referencing the dietary constraint issue, are you talking about
my ethical stance on vegetarianism? You are claiming that there is a
difference between protecting lives and dietary restriction, but my dietary
restriction does protect lives. So I'm not sure I follow you.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
244 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|